Hanafi Siege in Washington: Part 1 (1977)

More than 100 people were held hostage by 12 Hanafi Muslims. The Hanafi would only speak to reporter Max Robinson. His role and the role of the media are examed.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Hanafi Muslims
• Max Robinson

[tombstonehand1]

@AnabolicMutant

The people who did the siege were black converts to Islam, not foreigners. Their leader was Hamaas Abdul-Khaalis, birth name Ernest McGee, who was born in Indiana. The fact that no one pointed this out to you shows that they are even more stupid than you are.

[Mxyzptlk562]

@AnabolicMutant Yes, I know...when you have absolutely nothing left to say and you don't have the intelligence and creativity to create lies to support your outrageous claims....then go for weak ass name calling. Go back to exchanging emails with your al-qaeda wanna be butt buddies.

[AnabolicMutant]

@Mxyzptlk562

As far as i am concerned, you are just trying to polish a turd!

[Mxyzptlk562]

@AnabolicMutant Your uniformed, conspiracy laced, religious motivated opinions have no basis in truth. They are not based on evidence; they are not based on facts surround this case; they are on any first hand narrative of this story. In other words you are just making up your own story. Talking shit. You are trying to make history and the facts your bitch.

It's to bad you are so confused that you cannot separate your religious fables from facts. That does explain your intellectual retardation.

[AnabolicMutant]

@Mxyzptlk562

@ 4:25 Listen to this guy, you idiot! He's a white Texan or something, you nobhead!

1977 and you think a freshie Turk or Asian has an accent like that? HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

You are simply a JOKE!!!

[AnabolicMutant]

@Mxyzptlk562

You are a plain dunce, so keep quiet with your drivel. I have proofs for all my beliefs and proofs for my own theories too. You are a doublethinker (i suggest you look up the meaning of "doublethink") and you have nothing to offer the world except your nonsense nihilism!

And the proof of a creator is all around you in everything you see, but you are too intellectually defunct to see this, obviously!

[Mxyzptlk562]

@AnabolicMutant My standards are belief are much eons of light years ahead of yours: they are not based on fantasy, sky-daddies, conspiracy theories and evil cabals; it's based on the simple standard of facts and verifiable proof.

And in the matter at hand, as I stated in my first reply to your wild, fanciful, airhead assertion that this was all a CIA plot (which was done for what purpose on you can tell me), I said that is all crap. This was simply a vendetta by the Hanafi against the NOI.

[AnabolicMutant]

@Mxyzptlk562

> QUESTION:

Why do you believe and follow and trust so much those very same people who shaft you on a daily basis?

Honestly... do you feel you have been dealt with fairly and accordingly in life by others, especially those in alleged power (who, i remind you, are supposed to be public servants, but they seem to be awfully busy serving themselves against our favour of late in particular, don't you think?), and do you think these people have been fair towards others too?

[AnabolicMutant]

@Mxyzptlk562

> I'm afraid for you that it is, in fact, you who is at a loss out of the two of us in many ways. Brush up your manners and brush up your research ability and learn who to trust and who not to trust for real. This does not require quick judgment; rather, it requires the opposite. I am trying to help you, not fight you... so learn who the real good people are in this world. To judge people more correctly and fairly one must have the right tools by which to do so. You lack those tools

[AnabolicMutant]

@Mxyzptlk562

> How does having had experiences which serve as a proof in favour of my distrust in the media make me a religious nut? You are quick to judge, talk a lot and make too many mistakes and misplace your trust and your distrust too!