Richard Gage AIA and Jan Utzon of Sydney Opera House discuss 9/11 truth
Top Comments
All Comments (167)
-
@DonArsuk84 Yeah and you sir must most certainly be the result of all this stupidity with such nonsence you write....
-
@Flongowild - Thanks a lot
-
Jan Utzon says ”If you don’t want to talk about what might be the true or what might be false then you might as well go into the closet and forget about it” … (Correct me plz, if I'm wrong)
-
@Eriksz Your comment is a year old, but it is still true today. Newton is actually spinning not turning in his grave.
-
How come it is so many Danes supporting this man? the same country where most believe that people in Greenland only live in Igloos and live of the ice and the animals living on the ice... That is not a coincidence. Stupidity breeds stupidity.
-
Don't skyscrapers have to hold themselves up?
Doesn't every level have to have enough steel to support the weight of all of the levels above? So why don't we have a table specifying the tons of steel that were on every level of the towers by now? The concrete also? Didn't they have to figure that out in the 60s?
What kind of computers did they have then? Can't Gage and his buddies come up with that using today's computers?
-
Can someone to transcripr Utzons words (end part of sentence): "If you dont want to talk about what may be truth or what may be false.... " I dont understand whole sentence.
Thank you in advance
Great video
-
@jumblyman How do you even operate a computer with that brain?
-
@thi711 and of course the government has never ever lied about anything !
-
youtube
GAGE TVNZ
Building 7
Gage Utzon
Gage WSFM
Thomas-Scott Gordon knew that the Twin Towers were ear-marked
for early de-commissioning by as early as 2007 due to galvanic corrosion (aluminium-steel) , and he knew this as early as 1989.
vv vv vv dot 911oz dot c om search Thomas Gordon
NIST released a failed report. A cover up and a document that defies the laws of physics. Newton would turn over in his grave.
Eriksz 2 years ago 16
NIST released a very unsatisfactory report on the collapse of WTC7. They did a simulation of WTC7's collapse but they stopped their own simulation at the very beginning of the collapse! That is not a typo or an error. In addition, they did not publish their assumptions on which their simulation was based. That is not a typo or an error either. Science depends on the ability of scientists to replicate each others' work. Thus, withholding critical details is always grounds for distrust.
Skeptic121 2 years ago 14