Nassim Haramein: We are the Center of Creation

http://SupremeMasterTV.com • EE1194; Aired on 21 Dec 2009
This is the second part of an interview with Mr. Nassim Haramein, a pioneering physicist who further developed Einstein's knowledge into a Unified field Theory. The idea of "vacuum" or space, space travel, and the relationship between sacred geometry and spirituality were discussed. He also explained why we need to go within to know the infinite wisdom that we all have.
• Please share those videos through facebook and other means. Subscribe, comment and like it are fully appreciated. The videos are in the public domain and free to use in any beneficial way. Download Link: http://video.godsdirectcontact.net/daily/2009.12.21/EE1194.wmv

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Supreme Master TV
• Science and Spirituality
• Science
• spirituality
• Albert Einstein
• Unified field theory
• Nassim Haramein
• Coriolis
• electromagnetism
• gravity
• Resonance Project Foundation
• Einstein's Field Equations
• God
• vacuum
• sacred geometry
• flower of life
• double torus
• spirituality and physics
• space-time structure
• physics of creation
• point of stillness
• meditation
• prayer
• wisdom
• energy
• physics of Universe

[Starsandfunk]

@MrTriangularity I certainly have said that haramein speaks bullshit, because he frequently does. Lookup video 'haramein 5 of 45' where i've exposed some of the rubbish he talks.

But you'd ask me to 'stop swearing' when our past 2 weeks of exchanges have involved no swearing and yet you refer to people who present scientific facts against haramein as 'malicious trolls'.

[Starsandfunk]

@MrTriangularity Then why not post the link to the AIP site that proves that any of harameins papers have passed legitimate peer review? Any legitimate peer reviewed paper must backed by at least two named referees who are experts in that particular field and do not work with the person who submitted the paper (due to an obvious conflict of interest).

If you can show that, then I will happily accept that his work has passed peer review.

[MrTriangularity]

You said Nassim's work was 'bullshit' earlier, and your activities are hardly impartial or respectful, I also quote you as calling people who think Haramein could be right as 'haramein numbskulls'.

[MrTriangularity]

@Starsandfunk Well, you swear in other posts about Nassim. The AIP site says the best papers were peer reviewed, and you said he doesn't have any peer reviewed literature, but 'Spinors, twistors, quaternions and the spacetime torus topolog' was peer reviewed. And you're right about the title of the conference, but you fail to note the subseries. The subseries is mathematical and statistical physics according to the AIP site.

[Starsandfunk]

@MrTriangularity Lie no 2: You claim that the conference was on 'mathematical and statistical physics'. A lie. The conference was entitled the 'Ninth International Conference on Computing Anticipatory Systems' and was run by Daniel Dubois of the 'HEC Management School'. Even harameins website confirms this.

Lie no 3: You request that I 'stop swearing'. I've just scrolled back through 4 pages of comments and there is no swearing.

Exit the lie spiral while you still can.

[Starsandfunk]

@MrTriangularity You are so desperate to defend haramein that you have now resorted to lying. Infact your entire response is made of 3 lies - which I will address individually:

Lie no. 1: You claim that according to a site, two papers you quoted are peer reviewed.

That's odd. Because even haramein doesn't claim that the two papers you quoted have been peer reviewed. They have just been included in a computing journal as a record of the conference proceedings, nothing more.

[MrTriangularity]

@Starsandfunk Wrong again, the conference was peer reviewed according to its site. Also, this paper:

SPINORS, TWISTORS, QUATERNIONS,

AND THE “SPACETIME” TORUS TOPOLOG

was peer reviewed. You just don't think the journal is good enough. So you're wrong. Also, the conference was on mathematical and statistical physics, so the peer reviewers had physics knowledge, so you're wrong again. P.S. Stop swearing and your 'scientific facts' have no validity 'cause you have no ID.

[nrwhd]

Gravity gives weight, not mass.

[Starsandfunk]

@MrTriangularity "He has published peer reviewed scientific literature. I don't even know what you are talking about with regards to peer reviewing something for it's 'computing content'."

For a paper to pass 'peer review', it must be reviewed and accepted by experts in that field. But haramein was just one of many people given an 'on the day' certificate at a computing conference by people with no expertise in physics. He has not in any way, shape or form, passed 'peer review'

[Starsandfunk]

@MrTriangularity "No, I simply don't believe you/bobathon have 'debunked' Nassim"

No argument there, as you seem to believe what you want to believe. You could always address the specific scientific facts that debunk haramein - i gave you 4 opportunties below, but you didn't even try once.

"You openly lie about Nassim "

Not once. I present scientific facts that prove he is wrong. Scientific facts are not lies.