Battle of Los Angeles UFO sphere in motion

From http://alienspacecentereast.wordpress.com/
Battle of Los Angeles UFO sphere in motion - my second video about the spheres in the old Battle of Los Angeles UFO footage from february 25, 1942, illustrating what seem to be a secondary intelligent controlled flying object in motion, in close proximity to the hovering and larger UFO craft in the searchlights.

More info about the Battle of LA UFO spheres here:
http://alienspacecentereast.wordpress.com/2012/01/22/ufo-spheres-found-in-the...

Battle of LA 1942 UFO footage a HOAX?
http://alienspacecentereast.wordpress.com/2012/02/17/battle-of-la-1942-ufo-fo...

UFO pictures and photos
http://ufopicturesphotos.blogspot.com/

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Battle of LA 1942
• Battle of LA
• UFO sphere
• ufo
• ufos
• motion

[tehbible]

UFOs are hyper-dimensional entities. They are NOT physical craft. These entities have resided on this planet before mankind most likely.

FYI, you can meet these entities through ingesting entheogens like DMT or Psilocybin. The early Christian knew about it, so did the Mayans, Native Americans, and ancient cave men (30,000 years ago and further back).

[alienspacecentereast]

@grizzzlyjoe -you said it, more than one, that´s the deal :)

[grizzzlyjoe]

@alienspacecentereast Ok. Out of simple courtesy I watched it again. But it's like watching the Zapruder film of the JFK assassination. Anything that's newly revealed becomes quickly irrelevant because no one will revisit the event. Besides, I acknowledged that it WAS probably an 'alien craft' because (even in '42) AAA-fire was accurate enough to bring down fast moving Kamakazis, this remained stationary.

What more can be gained by pointing out there was more than one?

[alienspacecentereast]

@grizzzlyjoe This dialogue is now opened again...

What my point is?

If you haven´t noticed, watch the video again...

[grizzzlyjoe]

@alienspacecentereast What difference how many you think you spotted:

1) This happened in 1942 and there is no way to establish what you think you found as fact;

2) We already know it was probably an alien craft.

So, what's your point?

BTW: "An explosion is an explosion?" That shows how much you DON'T know about "Deflagrations vs. Detonations" ... look it up.

This dialogue is now closed.

[alienspacecentereast]

@grizzzlyjoe --it doesen´t matter what you call it, an explosion is an explosion, and fragments from explosions goes one way and does not tend to hover for a while, shift course and stops...

[grizzzlyjoe]

@alienspacecentereast Triple A = "Anti-Aircraft Artillery" ... it's surprising that you don't know that term considering the material being considered.

[alienspacecentereast]

@grizzzlyjoe -well, you should go and see my blogpost and the pictures there, because that does not come near a so-called (???) "triple A burst" :)

[dmanbuckmaster]

Thanks

[grizzzlyjoe]

Not very impressive. It's a triple A burst.