Ravi Zacharias about the "Shack'.

Ravi Zacharias about the "Shack".

Category:

Music

Tags:

• Ravi Zacharias
• Shack.

[natemup]

@apologiamixer Since he isn't discussing false teachers, I should hope they don't. And since Jewish (or purely Messianic) idioms don't mean much to an audience like Ravi's, describing their falsehood in colloquial English terms might do just fine, no?

[shaqdaddy11]

The Shack to me is a book for the Universalist. It points to an idea that there is a "God", but it certenly leaves it there. The thing iv seen with people who became big fans of the book when it first came out few years ago, is that now many of those people have turn towards even more universal thinking. I feel that in time such books lead people to a touchy feely faith in a "God" that is not founded on the solid foundation of Christ Jesus. When the storm comes often that faith crumbles.

[goruby2]

@worksequalsalvation Lets not ignore the context of some of that . Men who took it on there own without Gods permission,Lets also not forget the multimillions of dead due to atheist/Muslim/etc going on today and throughout history.Lets be honest lest we forget.

[goruby2]

You know I have been listening to Ravi and others for a long time.He is an apologetics master.What we see today( with people who disagree with Christianity )is the desire to make God fit into a place where you like him. The Shack is an example it has a good message but if it changes the Biblical nature of God then there is a problem and you should be cautious. Go Ravi

[FollowTheCloud]

i dont like the shack. but im in agreement with ravi zacharias on this one.I know many genuine sincere christians who were tremendously blessed by the book.And that is what is important. I wouldnt recommend it because i noticed some doctrinal issues.but most people dont read the bible so academic or theological.I dont think ravi was beating around the bush, he is not scared to speak against heresy. He just saw the good that came from a book.

[apologiamixer]

Ravi tends to beat around the bush a bit too much for the sake of being everyones friend. Way too much VRG (verbalized religious garbage). I wonder if hypocrite, brood of vipers, or whitewashed tombs ever enters his vocabulary. Those were words Christ used to describe false teachers of his day.

[inhalejesus]

@worksequalsalvation please show where christianity demands this?

[worksequalsalvation]

@goruby2

It bothers me because of the destruction, torture and killing Christianity demands. It has been the most demonic force on the planet. I cannot wait for Christianity to be listed correctly as a terrorist organization by the government. Oh happy day that will be.

You are only going to worship your Mithra Mystery religions for so lone. This Ravi is making million from it as is Swaggart and many many more.

[goruby2]

@worksequalsalvation It never fails. the aggressive cut down and snide remarks by those who refuse to accept the Bible. Bart Ehrman is not a good example of proper scripture use. Why does the Bible make atheist etc start calling names . If you don't believe it why does it bother you. I don't believe in Mormons, Muslims,Hindus,Budist etc . I don't go around calling them names. Why is Christianity different could it be because you know it is real.

[esq8]

It is difficult to speak the truth sometimes when we are close to people, but we must speak it in love. Christ talks about coming to bring sword, a division. Idealogical differences that are pandered to, politely accepted without challenge, essentially change no one and no one's life is transformed let alone our own. When the Holy Spirit confronts us, there is no compromise or pandering, but a choice. We come to truth, or we live in compromise and secure our reputation at the expense of it.