japanese rifle VS korean rifle

umm.....

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• gun
• shooting

[hugaku36]

Blank Ammo? Blank firing adaptor? Nonsense.

0:14 This Type 89 muzzule is not Blank firing adaptor.

Must watch this everyone.

watch?v=ySWAQHrgs04&feature=pl­ayer_detailpage#t=24s

and This is FACT.

Jane's Infantry Weapons - Howa Type 89 5.56 mm assault rifle (Japan)

“The rifle is fitted with a high-efficiency muzzle brake to reduce the recoil energy.”

[HongeKP]

south Korea can kick japan's ass any day. Yi Soon Shin did it in 1592 and we can do it again.

[AnhOOful]

총도 못쏴본 일본넘들이 총에 대해서 뭘 안다고 이딴 비디오를 만드냐??ㅋㅋ

[craaaaaaaaaazybird]

K-2 is m16+ak47

[craaaaaaaaaazybird]

K-2 is jus 240$

[Buuub08]

AKs dont hold more rounds, you goof. They hold 30rds just as the M16. There are variations ofc, but 30rds is the standard and hasnt changed to this day. You wouldnt be holding shit at war LOL. Let the milk dry off your chin first big guy.

[Buuub08]

@Xentradi97 Most refined? By whom? If it would have been refined it wouldnt have failed.

The 7.62x39 is far from being "far more powerful", only about 30% more powerful and even though it can penetrate brick and shit, it wont do any damage beyond. Even at a direct hit the 7.62x39 wounding capability is noticeably inferior to that of the 5.56.

[Buuub08]

@Xentradi97 Seen it LOL. You defo know jackshit about guns.

In fact the M16 round beats the AK-47 in terms of body armor penetration up to 100m, range and overall accuracy due to a flatter trajectory. AKs do jam, its a myth that they dont. They are robust but they do jam. M16 is considered more accurate for a number of reasons (flatter bullet trajectory, less recoil, more controlled recoil and unlike the AK its centered, AK wasnt centered, which makes it jerk up and to the right.)

[Xentradi97]

@Buuub08 M16 was considered most refined rifle at the time of conception. It uses NATO 5.56x45mm rounds. AK47 uses 7.62x39mm rounds which are far more powerful and can penetrate through cinder blocks and concrete walls like butter where as M16 fails to do so. Watch the side by side testing. And fact that AK's magazine holds more round, I'd rather be holding AK47 rather than M16 if I was at war. Idiot.

[Buuub08]

The Korean one is more expensive due to having a ballistics computer and complex electronic sights coming with it. The gun itself is worth squat, the electronics make the price tag.

I wonder if anyone know what operation they have DI or SSP?

[Buuub08]

@Xentradi97 M16 is far from refined, its problem in fact lies that it is NOT refined. It was designed on a piece of paper and then put together from aluminum and plastic parts using a system that already showed its problems in WW2.

Comparison in penetration and power? Dude youre an idiot, both guns fire the same round, they even use the same STANAG mags.

[Xentradi97]

@Buuub08 There's a clip of discovery or nat geo docu floating around comparing AK47 and M16 and why seasoned veteran would prefer AK47 over M16. AK47 beats M16 hands down in terms of power, penetration, range and reliability (it never jams). M16 has less recoil and considered more accurate because it uses smaller NATO rounds. Plus M16 is more expensive. I know what I'm talking about. You don't. Less recoil don't mean shit in battle field.