2010 Ford Taurus Limited - Drive Time review

Drive Time review of the all-new 2010 Ford Taurus Limited by auto critic Steve Hammes

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

• Ford
• Taurus
• 2010
• Limited
• Drive
• Time
• review
• Steve
• Hammes

[soulweaponry]

It takes me like 10 minutes to get 0-60 in my kia rio

[ThousanWhite]

I wish MY car could do 0-60 in 7 seconds.. :(

[jvrdlc]

the avalon is quicker 0 to 60, quiter, more refine, but less in tech and style.

[Taurusboy07]

I completely disagree. The Mks design sucks compared to the Taurus. The only thing the Taurus is missing is the vista roof that the lincoln have.

[boywonder0550]

the MKS is sooooooooooo much better

[TheNewMrCool]

I hope you get to review the SHO soon, Steve!

[NitroGadvRules]

@KneelArmstrong its gets that kind of mileage because its a big car. Stick a smaller engine and you may see even worse mileage. Perfect example of this is the bmw m3, makes 410 hp with a 4.0 liter engine and gets 13/20 mpg. Now the 2011 mustang gt uses a 5.0 liter engine and makes 412 hp. Both make the same kind of power and weigh the same (mustangs a bit heavier) but the larger 5.0 liter engine manages 18/26 mpg . Size of the engine doesn't equal fuel economy.

[NitroGadvRules]

@BigCarpFoxRiver theres one on the key too.

[BigCarpFoxRiver]

LMFAO at where they put the trunk release button.... what a fail.

[TCB1468]

say ECOboost!!

[mercracer24]

What is "echo-boost", is it some sort of sonar propulsion system that I don't know about? Do you mean ECOboost? You don't say echo-friendly, you say eco-friendly; that's why it's Ecoboost