Beatles backmasking - Hello Goodbye

Whether or not you believe that Paul died and was replaced by an imposter is irrelevant. What is evident is that McCartney had an interest in ritual magick. So here's my little contribution to the Magical Mystery. And from the little bit I know about Sacred Magic, there is the ultimate requirement that you place faith in One Supreme Creator, regardless of what religion you practice, and that you full heartedly declare your oneness with them. You will find this in virtually all texts regarding the Mystery Schools, Sufiism, and Yogic traditions. Aside from this aspect, in relation to Paul being replaced by an imposter. If it's true, it would certainly seem to make some sense of the lyric; "you say goodbye, but I say hello". Anyway, enjoy, and I'm looking forward to watching the comments unfold.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• Majick
• Aiwass
• Lam
• Liber
• Macca
• john lennon
• george
• ringo

[wollclark]

I wish these videos would stop trying to be "mysterious" and "creepy" and rapidly flashing obscure pictures of aliens, Aleister Crowley and Egyptian lore. Unless you have some way to explain why those pictures are used, don't use them. Also, backmasking is bullshit, the only way it says anything is if somebody is in the state of wanting to hear something be said from listening to gibberish. Without your suggested lyrics or the suggested legend it would be nothing but gibberish.

[ThriceHermes]

@wollclark Actually there is significance behind the images of Crowley and Aiwass, and if you do a bit of research into the occult you'll find that all Mystery Schools profess that there is "ONE" Great Architect. Paul was quite into Majick. It's completely up to us to walk a pure enough path to justify this amplified connection with One. But it is also prescribed to declare this oneness (like Paul). This backmasking was discovered in seconds. No preconception necessary. research "moonchild"

[wollclark]

@ThriceHermes

Stop using double speak, then maybe I, and others, will take you seriously.

[ThriceHermes]

@wollclark That's funny considering I've said exactly what I meant to say in both my responses to you. There is no hidden agenda whatsoever. If you believe that I'm twisting words to convince you of something in particular then you've clearly given yourself too much credit. Those who are fascinated with real Majick don't need to be convinced by "double speak". Why would I waste my time saying anything that I don't truly mean? I consider that quite out of sync with my previous comments.

[ThriceHermes]

@wollclark Another little note to consider. Things we do not understand tend to be mistaken as gibberish, choosing to be apathetic towards that which we do not yet understand will draw certainly to our disbelief learning nothing along the way. Choosing to be empathetic towards that which we do not yet understand will duly and truly lead to the sharing of new knowledge. And it's up to you to learn of Crowley's relation to Egyptian/Hermetic traditions. I think you'll enjoy the dig!

[increible0incredula]

awesome, men (: