UN: Iran Nuclear Dispute Shifting to Cooperation

The U.N. nuclear watchdog group said there is a "shifting of gears" in Iran's confrontation with the West and he announced that international inspectors would visit Tehran's newly revealed uranium enrichment site. (Oct. 4)

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• iran
• un
• nuclear
• dispute
• shifting
• cooperation

[KingKong1ooo]

HAS IRAN BUILT A NUK BOMB NO

end of story

HAS AMERIACA GOT NUKES YES

HAS AMERICA ENGAED IN WAR YES

SADDAM DEAD YES

WHY IS AMERICA STILL IN IRAQ  OIL, MONEY

IS AMERCA SETTING DOUBLE STANDARD YES YES

HAS ISREAL GOT NUKES YES

BASED ON THIS SHOULD EVERYONE HAVE TO LEGIMATE RIGHT TO SELF DEFENCE???????????

[agentmusti]

let s just go bomb them isnt that what this country does best!!

[canisdormit]

no, it's like saying that just because there is not a ball in your hand presently does not prove that you never had a ball in your hand. As I'm sure most people would agree, you have had several pairs of balls in your hand, and god only knows where else you put them.

[ua1001]

"absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence."

That's like saying "There must be a ball in my empty hand because you can't prove there isn't one there"

Also, that's the same bullshit that got us into the Iraq war which did absolutely nothing beneficial for either Americans or the Iraqis.

I guarantee you the same thing will happen if we go to war in Iran, as there are many separatist groups (BLA, Kurds, Taliban) which could cause a civil war.

Do the world a favor and shut up.

[ua1001]

I don't there are issues with Iran.

But you are oversimplifying things.

And if Iran was attacked, you can count on a civil war in Iran, as there are many separatist/militant groups (Taliban, Kurds, BLA) in Iran that could gain power in the event there was an invasion and the results would be catastrophic if the there was a war.

Also there STILL is no evidence of a nuclear WEAPONS program in Iran, it's a nuclear POWER program according to everything inspected.

[HeisenbergSleptHere]

Alll people don't agree on ANYTHING.

Didn't you know that?

[n0gar]

You have to get nukes.  Once you have them, it goes from the white man trying to stop you from getting them to the white man leaving you alone. Keep in mind, Russia nor the US has yet to engage in a nuclear war where BOTH sides have the weapons. Who has more to lose, rich countries with modern cities or poor countries with hardly any cities?

[n0gar]

The only problem with that reasoning is - why do people have to fight over god? If god is THE one, why are people breaking all of the rules of god (so they say, but don't follow), in order to praise god? Sounds like BS to me...

[EAH6106]

Most likely they probably would of, because it would proabably would have been seen as a threat to the USA and the world, and you know how the US is

[daderone]

english please.

[NotEasilyRegimented]

The sooner Islam establishes the new Caliphate the better. The secular world will evaporate and Sharia law will be the order of the day. Allahu Akbar!!!

Or, it doesn't matter if Islam loses. The final conflagration will certainly bring the Mahdi and all the faithful will reside in Heaven, along with all the beautiful virgins and the soft rocks.

Either way, we are going for it.