Scott Grainger (Fire Protection Engineer) - 9/11 Explosive Evidence - Experts speak out (AE911TRUTH)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
604 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 31, 2011

EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW!

Scott Grainger - Fire Protection Engineer

This interview is some raw footage of one of the world class experts appearing in architects and engineer's upcoming hard hitting documentary "9/11:Explosive Evidence - Experts speak out"

http://www.ae911truth.org
Source (thx): http://www.youtube.com/user/ae911truth

  • likes, 4 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (19)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @RBAWilcox the building had already been evacuated, their was no need for rescue personal to enter the building, in fact all rescue personal were ordered to help find potential survivors in the rubble of the world trade center. You're timing the collapse wrong, the collapse starts with the failure of truss one and progresses vertically to the roof as evidenced by the collapse of the east penthouse. collapsing in 18 seconds. You're only timing the last 6 seconds when the outer facade collapses.

  • @RBAWilcox Also, according to credible documents and other videos, firefighters and rescue personnel were kept from entering the building. You are NO architect, mate. The closest you've ever been to architecture was when you were working as a janitor in an architecture company.

  • @RBAWilcox The collapse took 6.5 seconds if we count from the roof line. Also, have you seen the schematics of the building? Have you seen this truss 1 and what beams it was connected to? According to the videos and photos, the building only had isolated fires. That fact is irrefutable. Also, NIST themselves admits that this building fell at free fall speed for the first 10 or 20 stories. Would you like that info?

  • @valereydyachuk small and isolated fires? according to the firefighters at ground zero building 7 was fully engulfed in flames, and the building actually did not collapse at free fall speed. In fact the collapse took 18 seconds starting with the collapse of The East penthouse initiated by the failure of Truss 1. Also about my youtube channel, non sequitur , my channel has nothing to do with this discussion. If you want to have a real debate leave my channel out of it, I'll do the same for you.

  • @RBAWilcox You might be useful to them for a time, but keep in mind that they'll take you out the same way as Stalin took out 95% of all of his "most useful" people.

  • @RBAWilcox Your profile says: About Me:

    So yeah I'm RBAWilcox, but most of you probably know me as that fucking government agent who writes shitty comments and thinks 9/11 conspiracy theorists and Beliebers are.....lets see.....don't share my personal views?

    Well, I would like to say that no true professional uses profanity as it is a sign of a highly underdeveloped vocabulary and intellect. You're just a worm, mate.

  • @RBAWilcox Also, I highly doubt that you're an architect. It is more likely that you are one of the thousands of disinformation agents working to calm this internet storm. You know mate, I lived in the USSR and can tell you that they had something very similar and here in the US we have it, too; only bigger by a magnitude of a thousand or so.

  • @RBAWilcox Your said: "WTC building 5 was designed completely differently from the north tower/south tower and building 7." I would like you to enlighten us as the the differences and if they played any roles. Also, the fires in WTC7 were SMALL/ISOLATED and DID NOT consume the whole building. For you to say that fires that DID NOT consume the whole building, brought this building down in free fall speed, is pathetic and you're not going to convince anyone with more than two brain cells...

  • @valereydyachuk you know very well that WTC building 5 was designed completely differently from the north tower/south tower and building 7. The main reason the buildings mentioned in the video did not fall is because those structures were designed differently than the world trade center. Also the fires in the World trade center were not normal office fires such as the buildings mentioned. Buildings 1/2 were hit by Boeing 767s and building 7 was heavily hit by raining debris and burned for hours

  • @RBAWilcox Mate, before you open your gu-gu-gu-gullible American yap, you should at least find out what happened to WTC building 5, which was completely engulfed in flames.

    Watch this video: watch?v=-NrASZxGu_o

    It's about 1:00 into the video.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more