Einstein was an idiot - ( The Gorilla199 Channel )

The Gorilla199 Channel - Einstein is not as intelligent as he has been hyped up to be by the Masonic Scientists who lie to you day and night - A lie does not make for intelligence. Discerning a lie however is wise. For more Gorilla199 videos please visit our youtube channel gorilla199 or visit our website www.letthetruthbeknown.com

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• gorilla199
• thegorilla199channel
• einstein
• jesus
• wisdom
• king
• solomon
• bible
• albert
• nuclear
• atomic
• bomb
• freemsaons
• illuminati
• nwo
• conspiracy
• science
• scientists

[CACBCCCU]

I wrote that frame dragging is mass-dependent, I should've mentioned it has to do largely with things like the effects of the mass movements involved in solar interior hydrodynamics. TIA to the channel for not censoring anything I've put up here.

[CACBCCCU]

There's at least a problem with putting a face on a belief system, a problem that most face-associated faith-conveyers seem to overlook, which is that people will put a race on a face and the racial politics resulting from become extremely problematic and seem to call for issuing constant tangible reassurance to others. In exchange for that and other blessings one gets to be on the side of a person with flabberghastingly astounding abilities and some sort of equally charming way with words. sory

[CACBCCCU]

I have basically the same problem with religion as I do with words, they both can be considered extremely important, but the harsh reality is that words are just words, and words are cheap when they aren't bought or sold.

[CACBCCCU]

I wrote 1/r^r instead 1/r*r in case anyone was wondering. That's the flux rule, which Gauss's flux gravity uses. I've looked into what is supposedly wrong with Gauss's gravity at lightspeed, which is surely something that both Newton and Gauss appreciated. Since frame-drag is intuitive with flux models and mass-dependent, known perihelion precession in Mercury was easily modeled using lightspeed Gauss gravity and playing with parameters long before Einstein was handed predone parameters, imo.

[CACBCCCU]

Why I agree with you on distance is simply expressed by this: if one has a measuring tape that is almost infinitely strong, and one strings it across a large gravity well, the tape will break before it can equal a light beam and well before it can approach maximum straightness, the straightness of the path of a neutrino or graviton, which both are not lightbound (light-limited) quanta.

[CACBCCCU]

I do respect your view. I will continue seeing the gravitational reality for masses as being similar to trying to take a boat across a lake and past a large drainhole in the middle, the closer to the drainhole the boat passes the more effort it takes to cross, much like the old gravity well picture, I just have my reasons to see gravity as quantum flow-based, it can fit the 1/r^r rule used with light flux, bending is an action and all actions seem most logically the product of quanta of action.

[CACBCCCU]

Two cents more: Matter is light-bound. In a flow-based gravity, light is directed by gravity to have a bent path, for matter too there seems no reason for a big difference from what GR says. Paths gravitational flow quanta take are always *straight* paths however, they are notably not bendable. IOW, gravity flows direct light, but quanta of crossing gravitational flows won't affect each other. I think I see how flow-gravity model can work, it's not too complex, just different. TIA for the space.

[CACBCCCU]

GR isn't quantizable, the big games are pretending that it is, that it's supremely-accurate, somehow beating out any flux theory, which is supposedly impossible anyway as any supremely-mathematical genius club member can tell you, and that it works forever. Well, I think I'm done here. I'm not endorsing anything else, just letting off some steam here. Whoo you have a lot of videos. I can't handle going to read the 2012-cycle stuff. Next year it'll be easy.

[CACBCCCU]

If you would've asked Einstein in his 50s what graviton particles are, he probably would've cupped his tits and laughed, such a naive funny question. Nowadays I'm sure there is a well-established protocol of more-manly cosmetic logic to profitably address it.

[CACBCCCU]

General relativity fans are often annoying with a vengeance, it is what they do. The entire gravity-theory media/publishing bunch are without a doubt unapproachable. GR is a dismal glossy conceptualization seized upon with all the religious fervor of some elitist mind-thug who claims his god made water clear so that no one would be embarrassed by its molecules visibly jiggling and jumping around. Clearly this was the intent, it's pure power politics, a shoulder-chip, nothing else.