What is the New World Order?

No description available.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• amero
• martial
• law
• new
• world
• order
• nwo
• illuminati
• troops
• soldiers
• news
• usa
• america
• obama
• bush
• reagan
• orleans
• york
• 911
• truth
• speech
• c-span
• cspan
• republic
• democrats
• concentration
• camps
• fema
• end
• game
• time
• days
• george
• orwell
• 1984
• patriot
• council
• foreign
• relations
• bilderberg
• canada
• mexico
• border
• borderless
• nation
• union
• NAU
• north
• civil
• war
• collapse
• financial
• money
• dollar
• theft
• slave
• fed
• irs
• tax
• alex
• jones
• prisonplanet
• infowars

[navyseal100]

All you guys are geeks...No geeky losers!

[FookHarper]

If being concerned with my countries freedome makes me a geeky loser I will gladly be one. Do you feel better being a cool but ignorant asshole.

You Obama following, war fighting, ignorant sun of a bitch.

[navyseal100]

Your just mad that your not a Rotschild.

[FookHarper]

Sheep

[179178]

It's comming if nobody stops it, but the apathy in this country is unbelievable, so it will just go on as planned by the uber elite

[GunPulseClan]

All of us need to wake up and fight against this before it's to late. They already have over 800 consertration camps in America. Look it up research it. Were going to be slaves.

Wake up every one!!!!!!!

[killa2king]

@FookHarper you should've said sonbitch like in one word. A little late but i just viewed this video so... yeah.

[NoGuff]

I have no doubt about the socio-political push for an oppressive one-world government, government from the LEFT, but this whole thing about the "bankers" doesn't quite fly with me. I mean, if they've been at it for so long, and they're already in control, why haven't they finished their plan by now?

I personally believe the Center for American Progress and the Open Society are far, far bigger threats to our liberties.

[NoGuff]

I have no doubt about the socio-political push for an oppressive one-world government, government from the LEFT, but this whole thing about the "bankers" doesn't quite fly with me. I mean, if they've been at it for so long, and they're already in control, why haven't they finished their plan by now?

[TruthAvenger100]

All the evidence I've presented to you is damning but everything but the collapse still requires one to believe the reports of other people and is thus speculative. The physics collapse issues however are available to all and if you could validly refute them I'd be impressed

[TruthAvenger100]

Then there is the thermite evidence in the form of undetonated thermite and manganese, fluorine an sulphur everywhere. Also the molten iron at ground Zero, jet fuel does not burn hot enough to melt steel, so where did it come from? Also reports of steel beams cut diagonally which is what pro demolition charges do, which were dishonestly disposed of quickly. Plus a wealth of circumstantial evidence involving /emergency services, the pentagon, plane computer overrides etc.

[TruthAvenger100]

Also the collapse occurs at a speed inconsistent with the structural integrity of the building, and at a linear speed, no acceleration or mass-based momentum curve. Also the uneven mass distribution due to localised damage would cause toppling and lateral movement. Demolitons experts must place charges at every key structural point up and down the building to achieve the 911 result, detonating at 1/1000th second precision else it falls all over the place. random damage cannot achieve this.

[TruthAvenger100]

Fair enough. It does seem though that the science is on the side of truthers. For example localised damage would cause a structural inequality leading to a toppling effect like a tree falling toward the cut, the official story is that the mass of the top section pushing against the rest caused the collapse but if the pressure continued the pivot/fulcrum toppling action would continue, but it ceased and fell vertically at high speed which discounts the official story of weight based collapse.

[Laysoles]

I answered it from before which I answered the challenge (hardly a challenge) you attempted to put forth of which the subject material you had me explain was various conditions of the towers collapse.