Upload

Nokia Lumia 900 vs. Samsung Galaxy Nexus

pocketnowvideo pocketnowvideo·3,064 videos
320,108

Subscription preferences

Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Working...
223,677
Like     Dislike 278

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like pocketnowvideo's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike pocketnowvideo's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add pocketnowvideo's video to your playlist.

Published on Apr 3, 2012

First off let's compare the pricing. The Lumia 900 is available from AT&T for $99 with a new contract, or $49 from Walmart, or $0.01 from Amazon. The Galaxy Nexus is much more expensive at $299.99 from Verizon with a new 2 year contract, though it can also be found from Amazon for $99.

Next, let's talk about LTE speeds and battery life. I've found the AT&T LTE network to be a bit slower than Verizon's LTE network, however AT&T seems to be more stable. I've seen the Galaxy Nexus lose its connection and never get it back numerous times. For battery life, the Galaxy Nexus is pretty good as long as you keep an eye on the apps. I left Facebook running a couple times and that killed the battery in 4 hours, but if I keep things managed it can last around 16 hours. The Lumia 900 on the other hand, has consistently gotten me at least 24 hours of battery life in my normal usage scenarios. Granted you can get an extended battery for the Galaxy Nexus where as you're stuck with the Lumia 900's battery since it's non-removable.

One reason for the weaker battery life on the Galaxy Nexus is its high resolution 720p screen. With 1280 x 720 pixels at a 316 pixels per inch, the Galaxy Nexus has a lot more pixel pushing to do. That's going to take up more battery life, but it's also going to slow things down.

The Lumia 900 with its 480 x 800 pixel screen is a bit faster at moving through web pages and rendering HTML5 animations. That's with a single core 1.4 Ghz processor too, versus the dual core 1.2 Ghz processor of the Galaxy Nexus. When you look at the screens side by side you definitely see the difference in the higher resolution Super AMOLED HD screen of the Galaxy Nexus. Still, you do get great blacks and saturated colors on the Lumia 900 and the resolution difference doesn't really detract much from the functionality.

When it comes to the camera software, Nokia's Lumia 900 gets to the camera a bit faster, but the Galaxy Nexus is much quicker with its lack of shutter lag.

Both devices are quite responsive when launching apps. One issue with the Galaxy Nexus and its higher resolution screen is that some apps and games such as Angry Birds really aren't designed to take advantage of the higher resolution and end up with tiny buttons. Not having variable screen resolutions is an advantage for Windows Phone in that respect.

In terms of build quality, while the Galaxy Nexus does feel more solidly built than other Samsung devices, its backing still feels pretty cheap. This is not true with the Lumia 900 at all. The Lumia feels like it could withstand quite a beating and keep on going.

The bottom line is the Nokia Lumia 900 packs an impressive punch for its low $99 price tag when compared to the $300 Galaxy Nexus.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

The interactive transcript could not be loaded.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.

Top Comments

  • zonafredda

    the nokia is much better!

    · 16

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate zonafredda's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate zonafredda's comment.
  • mikael partti

    shut up Nokia is much better here is some thing

    1.Nokia is much cheaper

    2.Nokia has polycarbonated in back

    but,Samsung has some kind of plastic thing

    3.Windows phone is not so laggy as android

    4.I hate samsung

    dont you people understand that samsung break down too easily and then somebody are wonder how is Nokias phones so thick

    thats because the polycarbonated back cover is so resistant

    would you go samsung that breaks down every drop

    or, Nokia that is really resistant and it has got (wp7.8)???

    · 6

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate mikael partti's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate mikael partti's comment.
    in reply to Bigk671 (Show the comment)

All Comments (962)

Sign in now to post a comment!
  • charesmagnuelle
    shut up. Samsung is much better. 1. Updated OS (ooops. stuck at wp 7.5?) 2. Stylish sexy body 3. The UI of WP is so minimalistic in which microsoft hides the low end qualcomm hardware with a bare tiled UI. 4. Every android user has the freedom to manipulate the phone's software. 5. Has Photo sphere 6. SUBWAY SURFERS!!!! 7. It's a CLUMSY user's fault to drop the phone 8. 1080p recording 9. Seamless PC and TV integration and the list goes on
    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate charesmagnuelle's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate charesmagnuelle's comment.
    in reply to mikael partti (Show the comment)
  • charesmagnuelle

    Agreed!

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate charesmagnuelle's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate charesmagnuelle's comment.
    in reply to Aqwgamer HaVeL (Show the comment)
  • Gohar Malik

    true .....

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Gohar Malik's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Gohar Malik's comment.
    in reply to Aqwgamer HaVeL (Show the comment)
  • Aco Salvador

    in considering apps

    windows 8 is released recently way far away from android

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Aco Salvador's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Aco Salvador's comment.
    in reply to Aqwgamer HaVeL (Show the comment)
  • Aco Salvador

    Salute :D bro :D

    I wonder that the weight of Lumia is the only bad thing for it

    which makes it good :D

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Aco Salvador's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Aco Salvador's comment.
    in reply to mikael partti (Show the comment)
  • Aqwgamer HaVeL

    Both r good phones

    Lumia=better social networks less lag

    Nexus=more apps and more games,more customizable

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Aqwgamer HaVeL's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Aqwgamer HaVeL's comment.
  • Yostef5

    lumia is better!!!!!!!!!!!!11

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Yostef5's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Yostef5's comment.
  • charesmagnuelle

    Dumn? You mean "dumB". If we're dumb, you're dumber.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate charesmagnuelle's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate charesmagnuelle's comment.
    in reply to mikael partti (Show the comment)
  • charesmagnuelle

    Boo! :P

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate charesmagnuelle's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate charesmagnuelle's comment.
    in reply to Sumit Roy (Show the comment)
  • charesmagnuelle

    BAH! Nexus is better.

    1. 720p display

    2. Jelly Bean update (Boo hoo no windows phone 8 for 900)

    3. Apps apps apps. Did I forget to say apps? More games and third party applications.

    4. Easy kernel and OS modifications. Unlocked bootloader.

    5. Better application coding.

    6. Live wallpapers!

    7. Long Term Evolution!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!­!!! LTE

    I say no no no no-kia!

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate charesmagnuelle's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate charesmagnuelle's comment.
  • Loading comment...
Loading...
Advertisement

Suggestions

Loading...
Working...
Sign in to add this to Watch Later