it's quite reasonable to suggest an airbus can deal with a strike, but two in quick succession? imagine a second strike just as systems were rebooting from the last, it's possible the electronics couldn't handle it.
Lightning strike was also a possibility or less likely, a combining factor. there is evidence of loss of electrical systems and the like, some minutes before the breakup of the plane. an airbus of this type is designed to withstand a lightning strike, aircraft have even been known to land with their radar cones or wing tips missing as a result of lighting strikes. the electrical systems on the aircraft apparently tried to reboot but failed. if the plane entered a heavy storm,
there are many theories. if it was a bomb, somebody would've claimed responsibilty by now. CptA17 said it right ^^ the weather conditions caused the pitot tubes to malfunction and the plane went into a dive.
It was definitely something abnormal. No plane or pilot malfunction as far as I can tell. I don't believe what the news says ever, so I always look at the evidence. Better for ppl do not believe what they are told since what we are mostly always told are lies.
i think they should invent something to keep the black box floating when airplanes crash... because in land its easy to find it but in seas and oceans with the terrifying depth they cant find it even with the beacons that send signals to find it..
IT HAD TO BE A BOMB.......think about it,no S.O.S and the plane is in so many pieces..and of course they wont say it;s a bomb because its all about the money..say bomb and no1 wants to fly. so they not going to tell you
rip
paintballa175 2 years ago
QUÉ VERGUEZ.....
LAVAAUTOS 2 years ago
it's quite reasonable to suggest an airbus can deal with a strike, but two in quick succession? imagine a second strike just as systems were rebooting from the last, it's possible the electronics couldn't handle it.
snakeyjakehall 2 years ago
Lightning strike was also a possibility or less likely, a combining factor. there is evidence of loss of electrical systems and the like, some minutes before the breakup of the plane. an airbus of this type is designed to withstand a lightning strike, aircraft have even been known to land with their radar cones or wing tips missing as a result of lighting strikes. the electrical systems on the aircraft apparently tried to reboot but failed. if the plane entered a heavy storm,
snakeyjakehall 2 years ago
there are many theories. if it was a bomb, somebody would've claimed responsibilty by now. CptA17 said it right ^^ the weather conditions caused the pitot tubes to malfunction and the plane went into a dive.
snakeyjakehall 2 years ago
It was definitely something abnormal. No plane or pilot malfunction as far as I can tell. I don't believe what the news says ever, so I always look at the evidence. Better for ppl do not believe what they are told since what we are mostly always told are lies.
jcoverload 2 years ago
yes
j0m3es123 2 years ago
Are any of you qualified air crash investigators? hmm.. Thought as much. So stop chatting shit about bombs and that malarky!
pengelly80 2 years ago
i think they should invent something to keep the black box floating when airplanes crash... because in land its easy to find it but in seas and oceans with the terrifying depth they cant find it even with the beacons that send signals to find it..
HazimKhayyat 2 years ago 2
IT HAD TO BE A BOMB.......think about it,no S.O.S and the plane is in so many pieces..and of course they wont say it;s a bomb because its all about the money..say bomb and no1 wants to fly. so they not going to tell you
rocgard 2 years ago