Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Nickel Creek - The House of Tom Bombadil

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
59,511
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 18, 2007

This is footage I shot on vacation with my wife. I love this Nickel Creek album, and this song is great. Enjoy the California Coast. I will be posting a scenic shot of just waves crashing 6 to 8 minutes long for you to enjoy. Click this link to get to it.

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=OhO2oT7lsbs

Category:

Music

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 9 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • why is Tom not in the movie? I was pissed off when I saw the movie and Tom wasnt in it wtf peter jackson wtf.

  • Tom Bombadil WAS part of the LordOfTheRings and he should have been included in the movie...

see all

All Comments (60)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • damn that was awesome

  • Im gonna keep this simple and just say awesome.

  • tom wasn't in the movie because the movies were, unfortunately, made for the people who had never even read or heard of the books. the movie was not made for the hard core Tolkien fans/scholars. while the movies were amazing, the only fantasy genre movie to ever win an Oscar (let only 9!) and are worth watching over and over again (extended only lol screw the theatrical versions) the story was butchered because a lot of the population especially the younger generations don't read

  • @Tabla461 Because the  movies were already incredibly long and the idea of Tom Bombadil was the easiest concept to cut from the story as it would have been one of the hardest for the readers to grasp and the least relevant to the facets of the story that Jackson was attempting to illuminate.

  • @Humpahna Yeah, but there's the issue, they had to pace it differently because it was a film, as opposed to something you could read and absorb on your own (not in a theater). I remember Interviews where they stated that they felt the films were too short too put everything they wanted in, and they run about the 3 hour mark. Honestly I think they did a great job, and some things had to be cut realistically, so I'm happy they were able to keep in what they had.

  • @Tabla461 I think Tom wasn't in the movie because he doesn't really fit the mood of the movie right before the hobbits reach Bree. Plus, I kind of like the fact that he stays only a literary entity. After all, he was in "The Adventures of Tom Bombadil" way before the Books were written. Even Tolkein himself said it's best that somethings stay a mystery. I think Tom is one of them.

  • ha.  i thought it looked like home

  • i've seen the movies, and ive read the first book, and am starting the second. I too wonder why in the world Tom Bombadil was not in the movie! this was a huge mistake made by the producer. He would've made the first movie a little more enjoyable in my opinion ;)

  • @crittinger that's why nickel creek is so fantastic! they're all truly so talented

  • @Tabla461 It couldnt have been. The movies were already longer than what Newline wanted, and Tom Bombadil, despite being a popular charecter, was not key to the plot, indeed he was completely unessecery asfar as the plot goes. He is a fun part of the book and is what makes the first part of LOTR so fun.

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more