Save the Uranium-233, Explore Space, Save Lives
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Uploaded on Jan 24, 2011
Google Tech Talk
January 13, 2011
Presented by Kirk Sorensen.
ABSTRACT
Uranium-233 does not exist naturally, but about a ton of the stuff was transmuted from Thorium-232 at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory in the 1960's. Some people would have us blend this exceedingly rare element with natural uranium for disposal. However, Uranium-233 can be used in an advanced nuclear reactor with interesting properties. Uranium-233 is the cleanest burning fissile material. Employed as an initial fuel load for a Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactor, this small supply of Uranium-233 can be the match to ignite a process that produces a huge supply of electricity along with small quantities of useful fission products. In particular, the LFTR produces small amounts of Plutonium-238, essential for NASA's deep space missions; Technetium-99m, exceedingly valuable for medical imaging; and other specialized isotopes used in cancer treatments. Nuclear power reactors can be engineered to produce many valuable materials through transmutation belying the term "nuclear waste".
Kirk Sorensen is chief nuclear technologist at Teledyne Brown Engineering in Huntsville, Alabama. He has been researching the nuclear fuel cycle for many years in connection with a strong interest in thorium as a planetary energy source. He is also a PhD student in nuclear engineering at the University of Tennessee in Knoxville under Dr. Laurence Miller. He runs a blog called "energyfromthorium.com" and is active in the Thorium Energy Alliance (TEA) and the International Thorium Energy Organization (IThEO) and is also a member of the American Nuclear Society (ANS).
-
Category
-
License
Standard YouTube License
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
-
6:53
India's experimental Thorium Fuel Cycle Nuclear Reactor [NDTV Report]by LuptongaFeatured
55,661
-
1:03:43
The Quantum Conspiracy: What Popularizers of QM Don't Want You to Knowby GoogleTechTalks
299,508 views
-
40:40
Is Nuclear Waste Really Waste?by GoogleTechTalks
25,763 views
-
1:22:09
Energy From Thorium: A Nuclear Waste Burning Liquid Salt Thorium Reactorby GoogleTechTalks
90,335 views
-
36:02
The Thorium Molten-Salt Reactor: Why Didn't This Happen (and why is now the right time?)by GoogleTechTalks
76,554 views
-
1:07:16
Liquid Fluoride Reactors: A New Beginning for an Old Ideaby GoogleTechTalks
28,077 views
-
0:56
Energy Secretary Chu on Thorium Reactorsby NEINetwork
16,982 views
-
55:17
The Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactor: What Fusion Wanted To Beby GoogleTechTalks
183,569 views
-
59:50
Aim High: Using Thorium Energy to Address Environmental Probby GoogleTechTalks
37,139 views
-
3:17
Thorium fuel of the future. Safe, abundant, dense. Russia Todayby Rick Maltese
9,401 views
-
53:24
Tribal Leadershipby GoogleTechTalks
12,854 views
-
49:02
GOD and the UNIVERSE (Watch In HD 720p)by altennis
527,501 views
-
1:37:13
Kirk Sorensen @ MRU on LFTR - Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactorsby gordonmcdowell
30,388 views
-
58:58
Dr. Kiki's Science Hour 84: The Nuclear Alternativeby twit
9,925 views
-
52:38
A JVM Does That?by GoogleTechTalks
43,675 views
-
1:18:41
How to Write Clean, Testable Codeby GoogleTechTalks
68,674 views
-
54:31
How Edmunds Decreased Page Load Time by 80% in 3 Simple Stepsby GoogleTechTalks
15,446 views
-
10:03
TEDxYYC - Kirk Sorensen - Thoriumby TEDxTalks
203,530 views
-
0:54
Thorium Reactor Question to President Obamaby hallezb
12,525 views
-
19:44
Kirk Sorensen - Introduction to Flibe Energy @ TEAC3by gordonmcdowell
14,171 views
- Loading more suggestions...
Top Comments
blenderpanzi 2 years ago
"Kirk Sorensen". Two Star Trek characters in one name (Captain Kirk & Dr. Sorenson). #WIN
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
KarbineKyle 2 years ago
SAVE THAT U-233! DO NOT use it for warheads either, & getting rid of it would be a waste! Why less space missions & more cancer? Cancer patients could use these isotopes with their decay products or target products for destroying cancerous tumors! You can't just get rid of U-233 that easily anyways, because U-233 has a half-life of 160,000 years! It should be used to produce Pu-238 RTGs! It could be used to melt ice on those moons to find oceans! SAVE IT FOR SPACE EXPLORATION & NUCLEAR MEDICINE!
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
All Comments (51)
Dude10659 1 month ago
I normally get upset when I see in News China is stealing all our Technology via hackers and spyies. But Now I am Rooting that China steals all our LFTR technology cause we aint gonna use it! How cool to see China with clean limitless power, they may become peaceful even or too fat to fight from all the free energy lol.
Plus India then will feel embarrassed and develop LFTR also, right now India is 1st to have Thorium Reactors up and running, but they may go Molten Thorium once U233 is had
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Dude10659 1 month ago
Sarah India asked Obama for the U233 thus sdaving USA tons of money to distroy it lol
Obama said hell no, you Indians could make U233 atom Bombs, wtf, India already has Hydrogen Bombs, to protect it from China and Islamic Pakistan the real danger to humanity and women! India said just loan it to us then, so we can get Thorium plants up and runing right away, and we will then return the exact amount you give us on loan! USA said we not gonna loan it to you, we gonna distroy it,
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
georg841984 3 months ago
thats not a mon its a Space station lol
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Martin Kral 4 months ago
Has the U-233 been destroyed by the government yet?
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
MegaBanne 5 months ago
I got a virus :(
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Joseph Stern 5 months ago
I thought it was very enlightening. How else would you explain the process?
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
kurtilein3 8 months ago
storage of anti-matter is almost impossible, also we lack the ability to create and collect it in meaningful quantities. So far, a handful of anti-hydrogen atoms was stored for close to 10 minutes. For a weapon, you would need to store about 600000000000000000000000 (23 zeros to get from the weight of 1 hydrogen atom to 1 gram) of these indefinitely. just too difficult.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Sarah Green 8 months ago
They should build particle accelerators to discreetly farm antimatter instead, which can be used to make bombs the likes of which no nuke could ever surpass... and stop using reactors to produce bombs grade materials. It's messing up global politics. Most of the wars we are (or are about to be) involved in center around the UGAIZ THEY HAVE NUKES premise.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Sarah Green 8 months ago
Considering all the other ridiculous things that the US government spends a billion dollars on yearly, you'd think that they might see China running away with the LFTR design and go "wait, CHINA wants the intellectual property rights on this? must be something really lucrative- maybe we should pipe in some cash..."
But no, instead the US gov't researches new reactors that rapidly breed nice, clean, weapons grade plutonium. *facedesk*
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Sarah Green 8 months ago
Also, U-233 would be generated in this process, and could be siphoned off to use in U-233 only plants. The LFTRs could dramatically increase U-233 stockpiles, and also dramatically increase plutonium 238 stockpiles for space exploration, and also dramatically increase the stockpiles all of those other crucial, rare, and very expensive things like Bi-213. The LFTR reactor design is extremely lucrative when you look at the resources it can put out.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube