Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Real Time problems with Bill Maher? - (PART 2 of 2)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
11,574
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 6, 2009

Real Time Problems with Bill Maher? By, Cheri M. Roberts, Producer/Writer - UnSpun Newz FILED: Wed Aug 5, 2009 PM For some years, HBOs satirical talk show host Bill Maher - of Real Time, has repeatedly vocalized his ill opinion on his weekly live cable television show, of those who question the governments account of the events of September 11th. Whether its directed against a Real Time guest or used as a punch line to his entertainment offerings, activists known as 9/11 Truthers have been lambasted as tin foil hat conspiracy theorists. But, then again, Bill Maher also publicly states the Twin Towers burned for more than two hours. This would make little impact on national opinion if it were not for Mahers impressive viewership numbers. Ratings are the mark of a TV man and Bill seems to be holding the high cards however, when it comes to documentation of what actually occurred on that tragic day and the alleged evidence that has since surfaced, it seems, the time has come for Maher to rethink his hand and callor fold. Countless viewers and fans have contacted Real Time - and its producers over the years out of frustration and hope of getting any one - of a growing number, of experts invited onto his show as a guest to openly - without bias, discuss new evidence that appears to contradict most of what we have been told. Maher and his team have not only refused to respond to any of their correspondence, but have also continued the live derision of a people, on a topic he has refused to research in any reputable way. So much so, that even after a $250,000 cash challenge issued by Jock Doubleday (to merely study the evidence), Maher continues his refusal to acknowledge on his show, the possibility, of malice, ill intent, foreknowledge, cover-up, and/or the potential involvement of the United States government in these attacks. After more than a year of honest attempts, these viewers were done being belittled and used as television fodder for a comedian who to them, seems to have taken on the 9/11 challenge and their message as a pet project of sorts. In 2007, the real battle of wits and wills began. Mahers viewers fought back with little notice or mention in main stream media. UnSpun Newz has picked up the challenge. This is their story *UnSpun Newz was refused comment(s) by deadline from Time Warner, HBO, Real Time, and/or Bill Maher. UnSpun Newz believes - after investigating the Bill Maher 9/11 story, that there could be higher powers pushing the proverbial censorship buttons on Real Time. In viewing this newscast you will better understand the upcoming UnSpun Newz SPECIAL investigative report that will dig deeper into who signs Mr. Mahers paycheck and what exactly their ties are to 9/11 then and 9/11 now.

  • likes, 75 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (unspunnewz)

  • Even if what you say is true, even if building 7 was a controlled demo, you screwed the pooch. You went about this the wrong way, you could have collected evidence and formulated a documentary, you could have gone about this in a less wackjob way. I know governments fuck over their own people in order to modify their opinions, i wouldn't put it past the US to do this, but you idiots made this a crazy person fad, screaming from the audience shines whatever you say in a bad light.

  • @ToraJutsu01

    There are multiple documentaries already which detail the evidence for controlled demolition. All you have to do is look for them or do a few minutes of research.

  • @unspunnewz Mate if you are citing documentrys as evidence then i think you rest my case for me. I suggest you watch Edward Currents take on the matter, he was a truther once.

  • @ToraJutsu01

    You sound a whole lot like a pseudo skeptic. Look it up if you don't know what that is.

    I also said that the documentaries I was referring to "detail the evidence for controlled demolitions" NOT that the documentaries themselves were evidence. Who is Edward Currents and what makes his opinion about 9/11 relevant?

  • @unspunnewz a pseudo skeptic, i'm guessing thats someone who is skeptical but in a way that doesn't coincide with the conclusions you've drawn meaning they must have made a mistake and aren't REALLY a PROPER skeptic, not like you.

    Edward Current is a youtuber

    This is the vid i referred to

    /watch?v=UULUQfEQFuU

  • @ToraJutsu01

    Why are you guessing what a pseudo skeptic is when you could do a simple google search and find out what it is? Ironic that you responded exactly the way a pseudo skeptic would to what I said. Anyway I have lost interest in chatting with you because you have an abrasive and arrogant attitude about a subject (9/11) which you clearly know virtually nothing about. For the record what you learned about 9/11 from the corporate media presstitutes is a lie.

Top Comments

  • nice report, thank you for exposing the lack of credibility of maher

  • When did Americans start listening to comedians over scientists on issues like the demolitions of the world trade center buildings on 9/11? Comedians don't know squat about physics or structural engineering thats why they are comedians instead of engineers or scientists. Bill Maher is an idiot and so is anyone who listens to his uniformed opinion about 9/11. Google WTC 7 and for Gods sake turn off the Bill Maher show.

Video Responses

see all

All Comments (153)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • some people like me moved to this country so that we have right to ask these kind question. Since when it is Wrong to ask and question the gov. in USA? Kinda funny

  • Truthers, birthers, tea baggers... all bullshiters.

  • I have trouble with the "Truth" movement because of several things. First, whenever a scientist isn't of the same opinion and provides his own research.. apparently he's automatically on the take. Then spurious links are made to prove it. Like in the Loose Change vs Popular Mechanics debate... The guys from loose change just seemed more concerned with their "message" than the facts. So it can be difficult to accept information about 911 without thinking "Anyone can lie.. even 911 truthers.."

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more