Re: flaws of evolution

Reply to this video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cOgig1e4KoU

Youtube videos about transitional fossils:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O4GdZOlPrX8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XUcB_HiCKnM

New information to DNA:
http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CB/CB101_2.html
http://www.nmsr.org/nylon.htm

Vestigal organs:
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/section2.html

Fossil Hominids - The Evidence for Human Evolution:
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/

A Radiometric Dating Resource List:
http://www.tim-thompson.com/radiometric.html

Age of Earth:
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-age-of-earth.html

Radiometric Dating - A Christian Perspective:
http://www.asa3.org/ASA/resources/Wiens.html

Music:
The Heavy Circles - "Henri"
Tchaikovsky - "The seasons, June"

Category:

Education

Tags:

• evolution
• science
• creationism
• dna
• gene
• mutation
• radiometric
• dating

[kiwiaroo]

An excellent response to that video, many thanks for taking the time to put together all the relevant points.

[theMadSmashedClam]

did you really need to add the 25% different? anyway there is a pretty big difference between 75% and 98%. and we do have things in common with worms, we both have hearts and as such a circulatory system we reproduce sexually, require oxygen, is it that hard to believe that the 75% of which you speak couldnt be useful to both us and worms and as such remained active for the both of us. either way, even if you dont believe in evolution, if it's the same information it does the same thing.

[Saukko31]

@xLOWGUNx Big bang wasn't an explosion in chemical sense, ever heard phrases like "population explosion" or "explosion of applause", are those explosions too? Perhaps a scientists can explain it better than I: watch?v=7ImvlS8PLIo

It astounds me, that people at this day and age do not accept the fact that we evolved from ancient ape species, or that universe is expanding and this expansion started what we call big bang. Science doesn't claim to know all the answers. You have no answers at all.

[Saukko31]

@xLOWGUNx Yes, the universe is expanding, very distant galaxies are moving away from us, and more distant they are, the faster they move. Expansion isn't detectable at the solar system scale, only at scale of billions of light years.

"Big bang" was the the start of this expansion, it is really simple, since universe is expanding, it was smaller in the past, and when you do the math, you get 13,7 billion years as its age.

Perfect universe? Far from it, vast majority of it is deadly to us.

[Saukko31]

@xLOWGUNx Actually we have found few objects in Oort cloud region, it is not like a single object which we could observe at once, we have to find the comets one by one, very hard at that distance, but technology is improving, and we can also calculate back the orbits of the inner solar system comets to see where did they come from.

My video about age of the Earth, it IS billions of years old, deal with it: watch?v=5aCgajML9tQ

[Saukko31]

@xLOWGUNx Where did I talk about oort cloud, and what has it to do with evolution. Do you have anything to say about the actual points in my video?

[Theboxer500]

@compgrad1 here is what scientists ill tell you. Things evolve because they need to adapt to their environment. Things that don't need any adaption and have no reason to evolve are said to be "mutations". See how science is always finding ways to cover it's lies. Mutation? really? You can't understand an evolving specie, so you just say it's mutant? Bullshit science. Evolutions is a lie and i see right through it.

[Saukko31]

@compgrad1 Yes, I know that some parts of the DNA what we previously thought didn't have function, actually has. My point is that there are parts that we know doesn't serve any function, we can remove them without any ill effect, and there are genes that have been mutated to functionless.

[Saukko31]

@compgrad1 "Code for"? Apparently nothing, since its removal didn't cause anything. We don't know what every part of DNA does, but we do know a lot, and we do know that there are segments that do nothing or segments that are part of genes that do not work anymore.

[Saukko31]

@compgrad1 So explain then how we can remove 3% DNA of mouse genome, non-coding parts, "junk", with no ill-effects on mouse.

We were not specially created, creator or not, evidence shows this. This is the reality.

[Proteched]

Call me a deluded cultist if you will, the problem is it's a harsh reality.

[Proteched]

Evolution couldn't be further from the truth my friend and the whole idea of it, from the beginning, probably came from the Nephilim.