This is Real Science? Chucky pwns himself
Uploader Comments (JPO1618)
All Comments (12)
-
@JPO1618 Ok fine. U can challenge my ideas. Most of them are very fringe, but so was cold fusion until a few months ago. ahahaa
-
@JPO1618 materialists have different heads to idealists. they can't agree because each uses different logic. i accept this. as for proving paranormal, it doesn't matter if u stay in a haunted house and u see movement at 3am, u still won't believe because, being a left winger, u will fail to recognise the pattern and claim it's a coincidence. I saw an orb for 2 secs and nearly thought it was a `coincidence', and then realised, hey, what i saw... how can i explain it other than to say it's real?
-
@JPO1618 science is all obsolete in 10 years anyway, and all new discoveries will come from left field. the media says scientists are always `baffled' when new things occur. everything comes from fringe that's why i threw out all these ideas on my channel, cos one day science will catch up to what is being observed, lol.
You said my channel is unscientific? Well we could get into symanics, but at the end of the day, `sciere' = to know, in essence science is general knowledge. Science is gnosis, knowledge, so who are you to say the information i am putting out is not knowledge? Besides, science is enhanced by testing it continuously. Science doesn't come from one source, it encompasses the bulk all of the knowledge in the universe - not just what one or two people agree upon. ALL new info is `fringe' info.
realscience1 1 year ago
@realscience1 You can claim all that you want for your definition of science, it just doesn't match that given by the rest of the world and is not what is performed by scientists. I am not saying what you are putting out is not knowledge (it is knowledge of the kinds of crazy beliefs certain people can have without a good appreciation for the depth of scientific knowledge already at our disposal) I am saying it is not science. Science is a way of investigating the world.
JPO1618 1 year ago
@realscience1 And you have to expect that by posting fringe science on YouTube you will be subject to criticism. Real science doesn't shy away from criticism - real science lays bare its inner workings so that critics can have at and is happy to do so because it brings us closer to truth. But real science also has high standards for experimentation and evidence and repeatability and consistency. None of what you espouse fits any of these criteria. That is what everyone should understand.
JPO1618 1 year ago
phew! nice video skills! Now, U shouldn't be upset that i blocked u. i meant no offence. i'll unblock u so u can write what u like. the problem is that materialists are born with a certain mindset, which can't really be changed so often arguments occur between incompatible minds who come from a different innate perspective, lol. so you can't convince someone who is hard-wired differently to agree with someone else. it just results in arguments and bitterness. lol.
realscience1 1 year ago
@realscience1 Where do you get this claim that "materialists are born with a certain mindset, which can't really be changed"? Is this from something that you've read? And you keep using the term materialist - I don't know what you mean by that. I classify myself a skeptic before anything. If someone can prove the existence of the supernatural or paranormal then I will change my opinion - but extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence as the great Carl Sagan once said. I remain skeptical
JPO1618 1 year ago
"It's scientific!"
Yeah, just like everyone know that if you uncouple the Heisenberg Compensators from the main Transporter Drive coils that you can beam holographic characters off the holodeck and make them live for real. It's scientific!
lol
Nice find, JPO. I think I'll give this one a visit...
CanadienAtheist 1 year ago
@CanadienAtheist I thought about Concordance's Homeopathy about techno-babble video when making this.
JPO1618 1 year ago