Why Aronra is god ...
Top Comments
All Comments (351)
-
@ToxicPaintsworks Haha... touche!
-
You said "the theory as a hole". Freudian slip much?
-
Integrity and intellectual honesty? Thats sweet. Hey DPR, I have some beach front property in Arizona for sale. Ill give you the best deal in town. Or how about a bridge in brooklyn?
-
O.o parrot
-
... personalities working together to protect the one real vehicle have to a more and more survivable future: Our collective intelligence.
-
I spoke with a guy at the NCSE not too long ago, and he actually knows AronRa. Needless to say, I'm thankful that we have these great minds and
-
Aronra is a great man!
-
@arsjth So your arguments come down to correcting my spelling and semantics. You claim to have read all these articles that claim that evolution through natural selection has flaws. LETS SEE THEM! Show me one article that shows reasoned evidence that mutation is not a primary means of evolution. Or one that shows how evidence that could not be explained through common ancestry. By the way when scientists have arguments they don't resort to personal attacks, lets stay on point.
-
"Show one ioda of evidence for ID, and people will take you seriously."
the word is iota not ioda but i know english is not your 1st language.
If i understand you correctly, you are stating that a scientist is incapable of establishing whether intelligence was involved in the design of anything?
Unless u witness it yourself ....its impossible??? Right?
@arsjth I don't play the name drop game. I don't care who thinks evolution is right or wrong. We can sit here all day and say this scientists believes in evolution and this obscure one doesn't. The vast majority of scientists do believe in evolution, but for this debate, the point is moot. The point i am arguing is that the evidence shows that gradual mutations in the gene pool causes changes in populations. The summation of these changes is responsible for speciation and life's diversity.
jofoatminn 1 year ago 21
@arsjth Hold on! You just switched from common ancestor to abiogensis. These are different arguments, of which abiogensis has less evidence. If you look at any multicellular organism, it is riddled with genomic evidence of its ancestry. And I will admit there may be some flaw in evolution, but that doesn't debunk the theory. It is a very complex and comprehensive theory, and is bound to a few errors but in no way does that undermine the theory as a hole.
jofoatminn 1 year ago 5