Confused Democrats On Iraq

Top 10 Reasons The Democrats' "Slow-Bleed" Approach Is Wrong For Our Troops, Wrong For America

1) The Democrats' slow-bleed scheme would micromanage the war in Iraq and choke off resources for America's generals and troops on the ground.

2) The Democrats' slow-bleed scheme would mandate failure of the new strategy even before General Petraeus - the same General Petraeus who was unanimously confirmed by every single Senate Democrat - and his commanders in the field are able to fully implement their plans.

3) The Democrats' slow-bleed scheme would lead to a contagion of violence spilling out across the entire country of Iraq, and, in time, the entire region.

4) The Democrats' slow-bleed scheme would place freedom and democracy in Iraq at grave risk.

5) The Democrats' slow-bleed scheme would telegraph to the terrorists how they can achieve victory, and ultimately lead to more - and not less - terrorism in Iraq.

6) The Democrats' slow-bleed scheme would ignore the lessons of September 11th, providing terrorists a safe haven from which to plot and launch attacks against Americans.

7) The Democrats' slow-bleed scheme would represent an unconstitutional infringement upon the authority of the President as Commander in Chief.

8) The Democrats' slow-bleed scheme would cut off funding targeted to develop the Iraqi Security Forces, undermine the Administration's plan to develop the Iraqi economy, and undercut every effort to achieve economic, social, and political success in the burgeoning democracy.

9) The Democrats' slow-bleed scheme would add billions in unnecessary domestic spending at the expense of our troops, whether it be $74 million for peanut storage, $25 million for spinach farmers, or $5 million for tropical fish.

10) The Democrats' slow-bleed scheme is going nowhere. If it was to pass Congress - a big if at the moment - the President has rightfully stated he will veto it.

http://www.cafenetamerica.com

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• democrat
• confusion
• nancy
• pelosi
• reid
• hillary
• murtha
• terrorism

[onetrickpony420]

liberals are pathetic

[greenbeenie60]

Your right only congress can declare war even though the President can commit troops for several months it takes congress to agree to this points. Here lies the funny part all of them did. They will say now get out but they were firmly behind the presidnt whichI still am.

[DRTYFN]

"Any questions?" Yeah, HTF did that dumb bitch get elected? Oh, yeah, Kalifornians. Nevermind.

[bayboo55]

Ohmigosh! And there's a chance they just might take over?!?! God HELP America if they do!!!!

[HarvBand]

Here's an idea - write it down!!!

[y2knoproblem]

Great Video!! Thanks.

[greenbeenie60]

your right and if you remember all the Demoncrats where behind the president on this one lol.

[brainplay]

Congress has no power over military policy..period. Congress can declare war. Once thats done they can't control how the military proceeds. Congress funds the war. They cannot micromanage how the military uses those funds. Please read the Constitution yourself and get those facts clear.

Bush got the majority in Florida. Give it up dude. Too many independent groups recounted, found he won, and posted their results...quietly. =p

[lrqpp]

He really needs to get off the meth, and get into X. That's the drug of choice around the whitehouse. When Rove threw parties with Jeff Gannon, there was enough pooper stuffing to fill a crime lab with DNA.

But back to the point.

The Dems caved when 1/3 of them joined all the Repubs to pass the "Pork & Iraqi Population Control Bill". They should be ashamed.  It's all their fault...NOT!

Hey Matt, Red, Shop - got any butt aches you wanna talk about?

[SHOP1210]

clinton is the other democrap who has there head firmly plated into the crapper