The Great Zapruder Film Hoax - 4/6

Scientists examined the Zapruder film. They found that, while most of it looks completely genuine, some of the images are impossible. They violate the laws of physics. They could not have come from Zapruders home movie camera.

Zapruders film is a very good forgery. It is almost perfect. Some mistakes took almost 40 years to find.

The scientists also proved that Zapruders film was not just changed a little bit. The whole film is a fake!

A movie film is just a strip of little photos (frames). The fake film was made by cutting and pasting real photos and film frames together to make new frames.

Because the Zapruder film is only 27 seconds long, less than 500 photos needed to be made. The forgers had almost a year to create them, before they were published. This was not difficult to do in 1963 and 1964. People had been creating high quality fake photos since the 1850s!

But what about the people who watched Zapruders film in the days after the assassination?

Film experts believe that a real film of the assassination was quickly altered on the evening of the assassination, using machines that could create Hollywood-style special effects (like Mary Poppins, created in 1964). Since the film was not shown on television, no one knows exactly what these people saw. But we do know that they described a film that is different to the film published in November 1964 as the Zapruder film!

In May 2003, scientists and researchers presented their latest findings at a conference in Duluth, Minnesota. This has now been described in a book, The Great Zapruder Film Hoax, published in September 2003.

The web pages below describe the best proofs that the Zapruder film is a fake. They describe some of the mistakes that the forgers made.

You can save any of these web pages by going to the File / Save As menu on your web browser. The images and small movie clips shown on each page will also be automatically saved with each web page.

If you want more details, please read The Great Zapruder Film Hoax. It contains much more information about the Zapruder film and its forgery. An earlier book, Murder in Dealey Plaza, has more information about the whole assassination and its cover-up.

In the end, you have to decide for yourself what to believe. But dont just believe what the U.S. Government tells you!

* * * * *

COPYRIGHT NOTICE: Video uploaded for nonprofit, educational purposes only under the "fair use" provision of U.S. Code, Title 17, section 107.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Kennedy
• JFK
• Zapruder
• assassination
• film
• hoax
• deception
• fraud
• forgery
• 1963
• Dallas
• photo
• frame
• Mary Poppins

[DoubleR666]

this is ubelievable. i never thought that the Zapruder film was altered this much. but this definatly proofs it ! i'm speechless.

[stuhlz]

disregard the 1-6 people because the picture on the left was taken FACING the people & the one on the right was in the BACK of the people so the numbers on the right should be going, L to R, 654321. I've been watching JFK assassination videos since earlier tonight when there was a show on tv about the secret service & how much they have to do to protect the pres. and since I wasn't even THOUGHT OF around the 60s (try 80s), it's interesting trying to think I can begin to figure all this out 0.0

[KAReiter82]

@fmgaluda They are numbered correctly. The Altgens photograph has been reversed so the onlookers line up respectively. The original photo is shown 3:25-3:31 before White starts his comparisons. You can tell that the photo is reversed by locating the motorcycle officer on the driver's side of the limousine.

[abennett4]

@homebuiltindoorplane So your theory is that the zapruder, nix and muchmore films were *all* altered? Simply preposterous! Where is your proof? Not only does the limo not stop, at the instant of the head shot all the blood and tissue is forwards confirming that the shot came from the rear.

[homebuiltindoorplane]

@abennett4 LOL at the Troll. Camera does not lie hahahahah!! Drink that kool aid boy!

[abennett4]

@funkmasterjee The guy with the umbrella was making a political statement. The limo maintained the same speed (~11 mph) from the time it turned from Houston on to Elm. The reason for the slow speed was to provide Kennedy the maximum exposure for political reasons not because someone was taking aim - that's just silly. Again, it is quite natural for witnesses to "misremember". The camera does not lie.

[funkmasterjee]

@abennett4 You are not going to convince me that all those witnesses are unreliable. That's total BS. Why was a guy holding an open umbrella when it hadn't rained for over two hours and then raise it momentarily 2 feet as the limo approached?? For no reason?? logic would suggest as a signal. For who? Probably not a shooter. Any shooter would be in radio contact with a lookout. More likely the driver to make sure the limo stopped (or sufficiently slow to guarantee an accurate shot)

[abennett4]

@funkmasterjee Jean Hill also reported seeing a dog in the back seat of the limo. It doesn't matter whay all these unreliable eyewitnesses said since it is clear from all the reliable and unedited film evidence that the limo didn't stop. And how would the driver even know when to stop? You are making all sorts of invalid ad hoc assumptions. Assuming the driver was in on the plot and would know when to stop and that all the film has been edited. Preposterous!

[funkmasterjee]

@7071t6 Which film are you talking about ? Are you talking about the unaltered version of the zapruder film ? I think literally less than 10 people have seen it

[funkmasterjee]

@abennett4 Alan Smith - "…the car was ten feet from me when a bullet hit the President in the forehead…the car went about five feet and stopped." ["Chicago Tribune," 11/23/63

[funkmasterjee]

@abennett4 Phil Willis - "…The [Presidential] party had come to a temporary halt before proceeding on to the underpass."