1970s Global Cooling Scare

The sky is falling chicken little routine, which is working to create a global government and new taxes on breathing and passing flatulence, is really nothing new. In this first part, I read word for word a Newsweek article from the 1970s wherein the scare of the day wasn't warming, but cooling. Now, without any warming for a decade, the slight of hand globalists have decided they need to change names yet again, from global cooling, to global warming, and now to simply, 'climate change'. This is all about two things: money and power. Scratch the surface of raw data destruction, cover up, and massive credit exchange schemes, and you'll find that CO2, the stuff you breath in and out everyday, isn't your real enemy after all.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• global cooling
• warming
• nwo
• 1970s
• carbon credits
• cap and trade
• tax
• climate change

[isocrate27]

So do you guys think we should tax both cooling and warming just to make sure ? What about taxing breathing, eating, peeing and fornicating ?

[TheSharpenedPen]

@isocrate27 It's funny how the answer for a complex & monumental problem like global warming (if it existed) somehow always comes down to paying more taxes isn't it? I just love the carbon trading schemes endorsed by the major oil companies - the west pays money to the east (wealth redistribution) to purchase carbon offsets. The third and second world nations (hell even China is exempt) then take our carbon dollars and rev up their much dirtier, unregulated industries... meaning MORE POLLUTION!

[imsailing2]

Great video....I vaguely remember hearing about global cooling when I was a kid in the 70's. But it was a real hoot to see the articles & cover of TIME!

Problem is now they are brainwashing/indoctrinating the kids which didn't happen in the 70's. I about died when my daughter who has been homeschooled up until last year came home from school to tell me all about the climate problems. She didn't believe me at first that it is all a scam....after all, her teacher said.

[TheSharpenedPen]

@bigun89 And biofuels became such a big fad because of what theory? Global warming.

[izelatlan0478]

One can't erase all change with all the results of one year\. The sad think is both sides are not thinking but are playing on emotion. It would be nice to know what is going on. This sort of stuff doesn't help.

[bribribri56]

love the work here

[america2revolt]

@isocrate27 I'm sure the US Government is working on it!!!

[RancheroBFT]

great vid man, I pissed my pants all the way through

[Texmurphy51]

@Undergroundhiphop1 Its also a matter of is it "runaway warming" caused by man. If you look at the facts warming is minimal & historically not outstanding. In a weaker moment Phil Jones of E Anglia agreed that

"from 1995 to the present there has been no statistically-significant global warming"

Scientifically there is not enough data to say there is warming.

[TheSharpenedPen]

@Undergroundhiphop1Your disinformation campaign is already being run by multi-billion dollar United Nations agencies. And you are wrong again: the oil companies are all on side for carbon credit trading systems - they are pushing it in fact. The reality is that you cannot divorce the politics from the science; when the brain dead members of the green movement cry 'conspiracy theorist' or that the "science is settled", while manipulating the temperature monitoring sites and data.

[TheSharpenedPen]

@Undergroundhiphop1 And no, it wasn't just one email, but rather a series of emails which outed global warming for the tremendous United Nations global government tax and power grab that it is. Global warming (or should we call it 'climate change' now to hide the decline in temperatures?) has been proven to be fraudulent. Not only are the models used to predict disaster dead wrong (i.e. there's still snow in the Himalayas), but its greatest advocates (like Al Gore) are caught up in scandal.

[TheSharpenedPen]

@Undergroundhiphop1 Typical. Could you answer the simple question that I pose to all of your kind - namely how does it help the world's supposed warming problem, when you advocate carbon credit trading - a scheme which exempts the biggest polluter in the world (namely China) - and send money overseas for the development of dirty energy, whilst robbing industrial production in cleaner industrialized nations in the west?

A: if global warming were real; it would get much worse under such a scheme

[TheSharpenedPen]

@Undergroundhiphop1 Not according to the University of East Anglia officials - the effort being to 'hide the decline'. Take a look at the huge climate changes which accompany coronal mass ejections from the sun - I think we have an inflated view of ourselves to believe that we could possibly compete with the sun in terms of warming, by exhaling or driving SUVs.

Irregardless, please explain how taxing clean energy burning 1st worlders & sending cash to dirty energy 3rd worlders helps.