i loved her FX in 1991, i think her choreo was way more inventive and interesting then than later in her career...but MIlo was amazing all the way thru :)
Milo was painful to watch after 1992. She kind of came back in 1994 looking somewhat strong but she always had terrible dance training. It's too bad because she seemed so talented.
i like this routine. watch it at the 96 europeans and it will be better. in this worlds, she just didn't performed it that well. the routine isn't bad, is nice.
i loved her FX in 1991, i think her choreo was way more inventive and interesting then than later in her career...but MIlo was amazing all the way thru :)
tedsler 1 year ago
Milo should have kept her routine from the 1994 team worlds. It had better dance and much better music. She looked boring in 1996.
keishaloveschelsea 1 year ago
Milo was painful to watch after 1992. She kind of came back in 1994 looking somewhat strong but she always had terrible dance training. It's too bad because she seemed so talented.
TuesdayPillow 2 years ago
i like this routine. watch it at the 96 europeans and it will be better. in this worlds, she just didn't performed it that well. the routine isn't bad, is nice.
msalasan 2 years ago
liubov sheremeta, a gymnast from ukraine
msalasan 2 years ago
What is sheremeta?
delodemi 3 years ago
That's because she keeps the exact same moves and choreography regardless of what her music is. And it definitely doesn't fit here.
I don't think she deserved bronze, Sheremeta should have won it out right - harder tumbling, and definitely better dance.
wineformybetches 3 years ago
The music choice is what hurt this routine. Excellent tumbling though and still well deserved bronze medal.
russianskatingfan 4 years ago
is not the dance it is the choice of music.... it just doesn't fit with the dance
boggydance 4 years ago
The tumbling was on, but the dance is very bed.
littlegymnast 5 years ago