Farewell, My Queen Official Trailer #1 (2012) - Lea Seydoux, Diane Kruger Movie HD

Subscribe to TRAILERS: http://bit.ly/sxaw6h
Subscribe to COMING SOON: http://bit.ly/H2vZUn
Farewell, My Queen Official Trailer #1 (2012) - Lea Seydoux, Diane Kruger Movie HD

FAREWELL, MY QUEEN marks the return of acclaimed director Benoit Jacquot (A Single Girl, Seventh Heaven, Sade, Deep in the Woods,) and brilliantly captures the passions, debauchery, occasional glimpses of nobility and ultimately the chaos that engulfed the court of Marie Antoinette in the final days before the full-scale outbreak of the Revolution. Based on the best-selling novel by Chantal Thomas, the film stars Lea Seydoux as one of Marie's ladies-in-waiting, seemingly an innocent but quietly working her way into her mistress's special favors, until history tosses her fate onto a decidedly different path. With the action moving effortlessly from the gilded drawing rooms of the nobles to the back quarters of those who serve them, this is a period film at once accurate and sumptuous in its visual details and modern in its emotions. Diane Kruger's gives her best performance to date as the ill-fated Queen and Virginie Ledoyen is the Queen's special friend Gabrielle de Polignac.

"Farewell, My Queen trailer" "Farewell, My Queen movie" "Farewell, My Queen HD" HD 2012 "Lea Seydoux" "Diane Kruger" "Virginie Ledoyen" "Benoît Jacquot" "Gilles Taurand" "Chantal Thomas" French period drama movieclips movie clips movieclipstrailers movieclipsDOTcom movieclipscomingsoon

• Category

  • Entertainment

[terryliciareed]

She was not, but she was a woman. A very sensual, intelligent and special woman - like most. I don't see why she could not love another woman and be heterosexual. What is this big emphasis on just sex? Love isn't all about that!

[Akawette]

Sad how people feel like they NEED to sexually label each other, having an affection for a woman doesn't necessarily make one lesbian, i'm constantly astounded by some Youtubers' retardedness.

[lilsis]

I saw this today. Excellent excellent performances by Diane Kruger specifically. Wow. And she is just drop dead gorgeous. The film was intense. Very well shot. Amazing film, this.

[Jose Sandoval Lermont]

The problem it's not labeling, the problem it's that they are putting shit where it can't be. I'm not against homosexuality, I see no reason for criticizing somebody's else lifestyle... the point is, it bothers when movie makers want to change real-life characters, for example, in the movie "Coco Avant Chanel" they put a subtle seance of lesbianess into Coco, and that's wrong, also here. If a woman love another woman, she's a lesbian, and if she loves men and women, bisexual. And that's it.

[anardun]

Or perhaps she was bisexual (attracted to both genders) or pansexual (attracted to potentially anyone based on mainly personality, their gender is just trivia). But really, why would it even matter? To find someone who you wouldn't normally be attracted to, who is not your normal "type" and yet for some reason you just fall for them, etc It is a normal part of human experience, as old as time. So why not just take it at face value: she liked a woman. Life doesn't always fit into neat absolutes.

[CitizenLovesIsrael]

How people label you and how you are perceived, is nothing to do with how you actually are. "That's how society works", exactly, it's wrong! This is why you have the "coming out of the closet" definition, knowing they are attracted to people of their same sex, but hiding it from the world :( It's self-destructive.

You can even experience an attraction but not carrying it out for fear of how society sees it. That doesn't make you heterosexual, but simply a homosexual who's (unfortunately) scared.

[Nenad Popovic]

Yes, because from the 1740s people started to think about Liberal ideas, which led to Romantic thoughts, and it culminated with French Revolution in 1789. Rococo is bright, playful, colorful, and it's more oriented to the rich, while baroque was strong, a bit cold, and it was a style that covered all aspects of life and art.

[StrongImaginationA]

Actually, no. Sexuality is defined by whom you have sex with. I would love to see your definition being true, but that's not how society works. You can experience an attraction, but if you don't carry it out, no one will know about it and people will label you by what you do.

[StrongImaginationA]

It's only recently (well, the past 50 years) that art historians have been making a distinction between the two. the art of say 1760 is too different from the one in say 1700, not just esthatically, but also in the thinking behind it.

[Nenad Popovic]

Isn't the Rococo actually 'Late Baroque'? Yes, I know that there is a difference, I like Rococo too, especially male fashion in second half of 18th century. Anyway, in many books about art, Baroque period falls between 1600s up to 1750s (it also cover the Rococo era), but after 1760s, the neoclassical era takes place, mostly in furniture and architecture.