Kubrick, 2001, and Apollo (pt 1)

Hoaxers like to claim that Stanley Kubrick masterminded the video effects for the Apollo missions. Let's see if his work on "2001: A Space Odyssey" lends any credence to that claim.

Category:

Film & Animation

Tags:

• moon
• hoax
• apollo
• kubrick
• fake
• 2001
• space
• odyssey
• conspiracy
• white
• noise

[eyeusedtoloveher]

the bottom line is that the average person watching this vid on Youtube simply isn't open-minded enough to consider anything diffferent from what they've been told... this video is a great effort in "reverse info/research"...won't teach anything, will just re-inforce yet another myth. Have any 9/11 misinformation vids as well?

[Astrobrant2]

@eyeusedtoloveher People have asked me to do some 9-11 videos. I want to stay away from that unless I see something interesting that hasn't already been done to death. There is only one topic I am considering right now, and that's the demonstrations where people try to show that the weight of the top portions of the WTC towers wasn't enough to collapse what was underneath.

Debunking that is educational and I'd be going after one of the major players.

[eyeusedtoloveher]

this is a load of trash.....pure mis-information....just another troll who is trying to get the rest of the sheeple to be as brainwashed and misguided as they are.

anyone who saw Jay Wiedner's documentary knows that YOU and anyone else who claims the lunar landing videos are real are FULL OF SHIT. For christ's sake you actually SEE that the horizon lines just aren't real and that there is front screen projection. FAIL.

[Astrobrant2]

@eyeusedtoloveher Clearly you know nothing about front screen projection and you see nothing of the kind. Show us your evidence and I'll show why YOU are the one who is "FULL OF SHIT".

Maybe you can give us a demonstration of your expertise by showing how front screen projection could be used to do pans.

[Astrobrant2]

@PCBHUK If you watched the video, you would know. You could also Goopgle "Ed Fendell" and find a bunch of stuff on him. I would have thought you would try that before coming here and making a fool of yourself.

I can only make up one name: Charlie Rackenham. I can't think of any others.

[Deke101]

@eyeusedtoloveher "I'm going to jump on a bandwagon with other moon hoaxers because I think it is cool. The more complex the hoax is, the more of a hero I will be for 'figuring it out.' Then I can spout my ignorant theories to everyone on the internet and go down the typical list of name-calling to those who disagree with me. That will certaintly lend credence to my theories. Of course I will never publish any of my findings for peer review. That would end the fun."

[kubkins]

Most people don't know that the moon landing footage from 1969 to 1972 was fake but the footage from 2001 is actually real

[Beelzebubbbbles]

@eyeusedtoloveher seems intent on promoting some real tripe: "If you want to see a real documentary/video on this subject, watch Jay Weidner's "Kubrick's Odyssey"". If you can manage to sit through this epic voyage of unadulterated guff without having to pay for it, best of luck. My nephew had me watch it. I showed him the old Time magazine article on "Captain Video", Ed Fendell. He was the man behind the camera, in Houston. A great man, it's sad to his fine work being smeared by a hack.

[Beelzebubbbbles]

@eyeusedtoloveher Meh. There's none so blind, etc. Jay Weidner is full of it, I rank his bullshit up there with David Icke. At least Icke hasn't so far had the arrogance to name three Laws of the Universe after himself!!! Still, more power to both of them for getting rich on the gullibility and downright stupidity of people like yourself. PT Barnum wasn't wrong when he observed that there's one born every minute.

My version of reality is grounded in science, not pseudo-science.

[Tweekerhead]

@eyeusedtoloveher You think they look the same?

Not one scene was accurate when compared to the real footage of Apollo.

This whole"green screen"thing is hilarious,when I was a kid we would just simply suspend our beliefs when it came to the crappy special EFX of the late 60's early 70's.

The notion is laughable to the point of side splitting convulsions on the floor.

I might see Weidner's video, but Brant' here has done a pretty good job, he must have since he's pissed you off.

[Deke101]

@eyeusedtoloveher You have no idea what 'people like me' are thinking. Are you suggesting the military is in the business of creating ground breaking special effects??? Of COURSE not all technology is out in the open. Hence the need for Top Secret levels of security on certain projects. I also know that the private sector invents things that put military R&D to shame. The fact that there are secret projects does not prove any moon hoax theory.

[Deke101]

@eyeusedtoloveher I don't know Astrobrant personally, but I know some of his credentials. They are not disputable. I also know that after years of seeing him around YouTube that he is NOT full of shit. I have checked many of his statements with historic and scientific records. He knows what he is talking about. Hoaxers, on the other the other hand, can't even agree with each other.

[rootytuners]

I guess hoax-nuts find it difficult to masturbate to this video.