The new Lancer & Impreza are not quick enough, for the sort of money you could buy a proper badge like a BMW 1 Series M or a Audi RS3. Maybe 10-15 years ago they were worth it.
@thebugguy212 maybe the sti could have just a few more horsepower stock. but the lancer has a rapid fire dual clutch automatic transmission. it spends more time engaged into gear than the sti would.
sti can never beat an evo period
YevgeniyL1989 2 weeks ago
The new Lancer & Impreza are not quick enough, for the sort of money you could buy a proper badge like a BMW 1 Series M or a Audi RS3. Maybe 10-15 years ago they were worth it.
espjuan 10 months ago
this site sucks
poserskaterboy is right
TheSandrica89 10 months ago
also watch this video titled STi vs. EVO by rallysoob. not only is the evo slightly faster, it can turn way sharper >_>
suck it. bizniiittttcchh.
Mirron1 1 year ago
@thebugguy212 maybe the sti could have just a few more horsepower stock. but the lancer has a rapid fire dual clutch automatic transmission. it spends more time engaged into gear than the sti would.
Mirron1 1 year ago
@ssbm00 STI for sure.
Camaromandave98 1 year ago
top gear is always using the evo FQ320 / FQ360 against the base STI.
poserskaterboy 1 year ago
@ssbm00 sti's 0-60 is 4.8 and the evo's is 4.9. and this is from the same website
thebugguy212 1 year ago
did they use a base impreza? there is no way they had an sti vs an evo or s4 cuz the sti would blow those two cars out of the water stock
thebugguy212 1 year ago
That's why i don't watch Top Gear. They lie. Watch a few videos on Tskuba Circut. Subaru destroy all Evos.
Kirimatusam 1 year ago