Burzynski Clinic, Tomorrow's Cancer Treatment Today.

Growing from a small clinic in 1977 to a major, international cancer treatment center, Burzynski Clinic is a unique organization providing a wide variety of advanced cancer treatments, including Antineoplaston treatment and personalized Gene Targeted treatment plans.

For over thirty years, Dr. Burzynski's cancer research has been inspired by the philosophy of the physician, Hippocrates, to "First, do no harm." True to this philosophy, the treatment regimens developed by him are based on the natural biochemical defense system of our body, capable of combating cancer without harming the healthy cells.

Burzynski Clinic offers a variety of Personalized Treatment options - advanced gene-targeted medications custom-selected for a patient, based on the identification of the oncogenes involved in their particular cancer.

The Burzynski Clinic services include oncology consultations, genetic markers testing, oncogene testing, health information services, in-house pharmacy for formulary management, nutrition counseling, medication training and patient treatment monitoring.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Burzynski Clinic
• Stanislaw R Burzynski
• MD Anderson
• Lymphoma
• Brain Tumor
• Burzynski
• Breast Cancer
• Patients
• Liver Cancer
• Prostate Cancer
• Antineplastons

[cappsie1]

I would like to see some evidence, based on Phase 3 and 4 trials, and peer reviews please.

[cappsie1]

@sweetclaire06 Totally agree with you. We're still awaiting the now-infamous missing trial data. Without that, no one that draw any conclusion except that it was never published. After more than 30 years, surely there should be a decent amount of data that can be peer reviewed.

[frootloopsian]

No problem, genius. Dr. Burzynski's patients HAD CANCER! Now, they DON'T HAVE CANCER!

This is the only evidence which EVEN A CHILD would require in order to make a decision on the effectiveness of the Antineoplaston Therapy. Several of those USED TO BE DYING children are in the Dr. Burzynski - Antineoplaston Therapy video which is in Youtube and Netflix.

I truly do enjoy dealing with IDIOTS.

[MegaPaddy86]

@frootloopsian empirical evidence please. RCT data please. It's been 30 years.

[MegaPaddy86]

The Burzynski Clinic, what happens when correlation and causation get a little bit muddled in one man's mind.

[frootloopsian]

2. ...GUILTY of a Crime. How so? People look to these sort of blogs in hopes of finding the answers which their Md's refuse to give. Many people have been swayed by comments from YOU, mmsfraud, footman, limp'nredick, and other PharmaShill bots which cruise these blogs.

Claire, you could be held accountable if such proof was presented as evidence in a Wrongful Death action.

That's right, shit for brains. You're bullshit could cost someone their LIFE!

Burzynski's therapy WORKS!

[frootloopsian]

1. NOT Hot Claire. You should take a close look at the idiotic "cyber terrorism" (ha ha) laws. Up to this point, you haven't told the truth about ANYTHING! If you were in Ka Ka Anada, you could face serious penalty under the MOSTLY laughable Bill 46 Laws. BUT, one part of Bill 46 is perfect, and is designed to deal with idiots such as YOUR little PharmaShill/Bill/Jill group.

IF you enter into a GROUP LIE which HURTS innocent people, EVEN IF you personally don't PROFIT FINANCIALLY, you are...

[sweetclaire06]

@goconnor73 It was the public outcry for faster drug approval that resulted in the The Prescription Drug User Fee Act. This act was simply a way for the FDA to gain the funds necessary to pay for the additional "man power" needed to get new drugs to market faster.Better to make the Pharms pay for this than to raise taxes.There are several different user fees.Overall I think it's a 'good thing'.

[sweetclaire06]

@frootloopsian "Are you really my ex wife? She, like you, was Dumb As A Post, and lied her ass off daily! But she was Hot to the point of stopping a room so I forgave the BS"

Hey Frootshit FINALLY some words of truth from you! I have no doubt your wife was in fact "dumb as a post" after all she did marry YOU.

[goconnor73]

@goconnor73 As far as bringing drugs to market, Congress screwed us under Bush by forcing the FDA to shorten trial times and by just charging more to get a drug on the market. The same people who work for the drug companies work for the FDA, so it is not as regulated as you might think. Major conflict of interest going on there. The drug companies perform their own trials and report efficacy to FDA. FDA does not do their own trials separate from drug companies. It's a mess.

[goconnor73]

@sweetclaire06 So I looked it up. You are right. Supreme Court ruled in 09 that we can now sue the pharma companies! They were under FDA approval before. There's a catch though. You can only sue if the company doesn't make an explicit warning about the side effects, administration purpose, etc.. In other words, if the drug says "may cause Steven-Johnson syndrome" and you get it, you can't sue. But if it does not say it and yo get it, you can sue. It's better than nothing! And it's a first step.