Top Comments
All Comments (2,164)
-
@icast05 if you are right and theyre gonna fall hard, they would fall hard in a direction, not fall into itself at almost freefall speeds, just like a planned demolition... id suggest watching Zeitgeist
-
the fact of the matter is that before 9/11/2001 no steel structured highrise building in history had collapsed due to fire, and it wasn't that these types of buildings had never been on fire, yet on 9/11 three buildings turned to dust and fell into there own footprint.
-
@icast05 haha, really? a 200000 ton steel structure turning completely into dust due to an airplane exploding into it, twice? seems horsecrap to me :)
-
@XJT1972X I don't know if I'm right or not - I just know building 7 did not come down as a result of fire.
-
@k2kraze They should allow as much time as NECESSARY to complete the job correctly.......if not them SOME OTHER AGENCY.....just a poor excuse to buy more time and fool people long enough..........people want answers......too much stuff STINKS about that day.......people arent buying the official story any more
-
@MrSmackdab I dont have any degree........just my eyes to see that your right
-
@darknesseveraftergod Yes they would........but do you think they would actually build the replica with the exact same materials? I dont think they would.......They first have to do a couple trials in secret till they can figure out how to make it look like 9/11.
-
@MrSmackdab people have blew the whistle..........the problem is they always end up commiting "suicide"?!? or mysteriously disappearing
-
@icast05 what about building 7 then?
No Adam, the real problem is is that your paycheck is signed by the same entities that took those buildings down in the first place
MrSmackdab 4 months ago 10
@Darkit2099 I only want one explanation: building 7.
Go -
MrSmackdab 1 month ago 8