Tigers bite force Scientifically tested at 1,275 lbs, Lions bite force Scientifically tested at 691 lbs.
Top Comments
All Comments (83)
-
Um no offense but you like many others keep over using that 691 figure that has already been proven to come from an immature lion(NOT fully grown)
-
but when lion and a tiger fight in the wild not in the cage the lion would simply win because lions are more expirienced fighter than a tiger because a tiger use only stealth.
-
i have an american rottie you fool!
-
this guy is racist against lions!!!!!! lol
-
@legolas3157 You're right. Lions are buolt for fighting that's in their DNA, fight, fuck, and eat. They can afford to get hurt, as the pack can still hunt for him. Tigers don't have that luxury.
-
Tiger has a broader skull and a higher bite force because of the Jaw structure. I thought the Tigers were recorded at 1000lbs and the Lions 750lbs? hmmm I could be wrong.
-
@xfarazx lol, Any lion would give a tiger a run for its money. Half the time even come out on top.
-
UFC's Cain Velasquez: 2230lbs
-
he's right, everyone
who needs discovery channel when some guy off the internet has all the answers? and of course, they are supported by empirical evidence and are not biased at all
please do another video!
rottweilers are German, not American
gravity5 2 years ago 11
Uh, GuyRoss, you keep talking about "lame videos" that offer "no science" but that's the category that your own video falls into. I see no scientific documentation to support your claims. You offer only your unsubstantiated assertion that the structure of a lion's jaw is thinner than that of the tiger. I don't believe this to be true. If you want to convince me, how about offering some data based upon skull measurements of the two species?
JackKangaroo1 1 year ago 2