Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Obama Citizenship - Lightfoot / Keyes v. Bowen 3/3

12/08/2008 - Orly Taitz, California constitutional law attorney who is representing former presidential candidate Alan Keyes (Keyes v. Bowen) and Lightfoot v. Bowen, discusses the case against Bara...  
 
Customize

More From: JoetheElectrician

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
40 ratings
Sign in to rate
3,637 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (1)

Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (95)   Options

Loading...
agat0r (4 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Not only are you incapable of answering a simple questrion, you apparently didn't read my note. What I said was that the Crusaders were not "Christians"-and then I told you the errors in your thinking. They couldn't have been since it would have been impossible to know "Christ". Moreover, there is nothing in Scripture that orders or condones their actions. Islam however is the opposite(if you would ever resad the tenets). Their text directly orders and condones violence. Muhammed was a terrorist
oscll8or (4 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
In your writing you claim to expose Islam for what it is, because we need to know the truth. You also make mention of your works, partially put out there to help the Muslims understand that they are themselves the biggest victims of Islam and you are helping them see the truth behind Muhammad's lies to them and the rest of the world. Taking this very diplomatic stance, how can you then go on to say that you've never met a Muslim that wasn't a liar? A liar for being duped? Please explain.
agat0r (4 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
No problem, ask any Muslim on the planet if "Allah is the Arabic word for "God" That is errant but since it exposes Islam as the fraud it is, they MUST lie. Furthermore, they will tell you that Jihad is a spiritual struggle...another lie. Now answer my question: What makes them "extremists" or "radicals"? The truth is that they are simply good Muslims. What "terrorists" do is in complete harmony with their text, and they are following Muhammed perfectly.
agat0r (4 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
BTW, Muhammed tells Muslims it is OK to lie. Bet ya didn't know that, did you?

And I am not a "Christian". I do serve Yahuweh and trust in the atoning sacrifice of who you call "Jesus"(Yahushua) but I am too informed to call myself a "Christian"-long story but the word actually means "drugged or whitewashed" which is why it doesn't exist in the text.
oscll8or (4 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Btw, I am an agnostic and have no "skin" in the game. You are obviously well versed in ancient texts and their many interpretations. Admittedly more so than I. (That is what you wanted to hear right?) As for calling all Muslims liars, which is what prompted this debate, is there a possibility someone can be misinformed and yet not be a liar? If a student
repeats what his teacher says is he a liar or just misinformed? Lying implies intent. Are all Jews and Christians also liars?
agat0r (4 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
While it's true that I have spent countless hours doing my homework, I have no desire "to be right" and I get no bonus points for such. Here's what you may find shocking-I know I did when I was agnostic. God hates religions-all of them. They are all man made-not scriptural. They serve and enrich men-not God. But worse, they all lead men astray. This is why you are agnostic. If you are like me, you view God as silly because religion is silly. However, He thinks they are just as stupid as you do.
oscll8or (4 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Would it be possible that just as these "uniformed Christian's" who practice what they are preached to by way of their church's interpretation, those who mean well but aren't truly serving as God may have intended, are paralleled by well meaning peaceful Muslims who based on their teacher's interpretation are serving as they were taught?. In all religion it's the interpretation that's taught which dictates how it's disciples will serve.
To your question: semantics.
agat0r (4 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
The Gospels promise heaven to those who accept the Messiah as their Savior. Killing is not an express ticket to heaven.
Allah, by contrast, gave Muslims hundreds of commands to kill. His orders were open-ended - surviving throughout time. The Qur'an only promises paradise to murderers. Allah especially hated Christians and Jews, ordering Muslims to fight them until they were "wiped out to the last." This is fundamental Islam - the very core of Muhammads message.
agat0r (4 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
This is why it is foolish to call them "radical" or "extremists". They are good Muslims following in the footsteps of Muhammed. In fact, Allah hates peaceful Muslims. He says they are "hypocrits" and the "most vile of creatures". He claims to reserve the hottest ploaces in hell for them, where he will personally torture them. He orders them to be killed. This is why you see good jihadist Muslims killing peaceful Muslims.
agat0r (4 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
It's why the terrorist responsible for the lockerbie event, in which 270 people were killed, was given a heros welcome yesterday. Speaking out against such acts in a Muslim country is a death certificate. The bottom line is that one would have to twist and corrupt the "christian" Scriptures to murder and Islam's text would have to be twisted to be a peaceful Muslim. Actually, there is no such thing as a peaceful Muslim-Allah says they "cease to be a Muslim"-they are night and day different.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.