Science and Religion: Empirical Verification and God
Top Comments
All Comments (19)
-
At 0:31, is the atheist quacking like a duck, or has a mentally retarded individual taken over his microphone?
-
test comment
-
"an invisible sky wizard made of magical non matter"
Is that really your definition/understanding of the "God" concept?
-
The multi-verse hypothesis is fascinating, but it can be either atheistic or theistic. Do you think that it is even possible that the "thing" manufacturing universes is a mind (or mind-like)? Is that at least possible? Could the universe-manufacturer be sentient? If so, "it" would be God. If it's not sentient, then it's not God.
OF COURSE theists will need to offer evidence for their view, but your description of God as "invisible dad in the sky" is an unhelpful caricature of theism.
-
I don't follow any actual theory.
I don't believe the actual state of science knows it all, there are going to be corrections made.
So any idea i believe in, is one of my own, built upon facts of life.
so to answer your question: no i do not believe that a theory without facts did it. I am not a christian.
-
@liquidminds: So you think a theory that has only implications behind it (and no facts whatsoever) did it?
-
@drcraigvideos: I believe, that wherever "NOTHING" is, an infinite potential of things to become exists. So infinitly huge amounts of multiverses can come into existance and drop out of it in their natural cause of time.
One of these universes, happened to have an environment that supports life and so it came.
spreading like conway's game of life...
MarkG45 -- rabbits are composed of matter. So they could not have created matter. Not to mention that matter is visible, so to talk about an invisible rabbit is like talking about a married bachelor.
Jugglable 2 years ago 6
@liquidminds: Uhm, yeah, you don't follow a theory except you think the multiverse theory is tenable. You may not be a Christian, but you're being arbitrary and you're not making much sense.
drcraigvideos 2 years ago 2