Alex Jones Interviews Ralph Nader pt.2

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,186
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 27, 2008

Alex Jones discusses the lack of difference between Barack Obama and John McCain with Ralph Nader, independent presidential candidate.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • both parties are fuck us up and it's not the third parties fault, it's the ignorance of americans. Instead of blaming the electoral college and delegates they blame third parties as "spoilers" which is ridiculous. Our country is a Republic, if it was a democracy then the people's vote would win. And if people want a democracy then they need to realize that third party candidates are just as legitimate as the two party corporate scam. Third parties are getting more recognized and it's about time.

  • Nader is theonly qualified candidate in this race

see all

All Comments (26)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The following is a list of YouTube subscription number totals for presidential candidates as of 8.16.08.

    Barack Obama 72,994

    Ron Paul 52,642

    John McCain 12,121

    Bob Barr 4,611

    Ralph Nader 1,996

    Help Ralph Subscribe!!

  • Thanks for that info.

  • But you also got to realize the people in the mainstream media are owned by most of the corporations that are profiting from the war. They don't want third parties to be heard because they actually want to change our system and get corporations out of the government. BUT, they also have to abide by their own rules, they said they will allow third parties IF they have a chance. Nader and Barr will be on 45+ state ballots. Plus Nader is on CA and NY which are big states.

  • Marisacald- Clinton/Dole decided 3rd parties no longer involved/or very limited in debate- as Clinton won when Ross perot had 20% vote in 92- Perot ruined Bush1 in 92- but Dole knew Perot could only harm him in 96, and Clinton did too as he was far enough ahead that He didnt need/want a 3 party debate- so the 2 neocons agreed- blackball the 3rd party. Ross perot set a precedant, but also fucked 3rd party, not his fault- fuckin neocons

    and yes,Not to many know we are a republic-

  • Word up! I support the carbon tax too!

  • Great Interview!

  • thank you. I think that the two parties had their chance. The republicans stand by Bush (except Ron Paul!) and the Democrats when they took majority of congress had the chance to not vote to ridiculous bills like Patriot Act and FISA. They could have been a real opposition to the republicans, but they didn't. And I think that's what really turned me off of the democrats. Is Obama a better person than McCain, yeah. Is he a better leader, no. He didn't say NO to those bills, he followed...

  • yea i couldnt agree with you more on that one...

  • Nader supports carbon tax :) !

  • Republicans do fuck things over worse.

    ------

    Bill Clinton was elected to his 1st term with only 33 or 37% of the vote - thanks largely to Ross Perot running.

    Some people wanted a 2nd term with old Bush. Many people are glad Clinto had the help. Many many others actually wanted Perot.

    The door swings both ways; More recently - most infavorably!

    but,

    Ignoramous Bush "won" by 537 votes - with 5 or 6 million votes UNCOUNTED! So, how can THAT be a 3rd party's fault?

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more