Greg Bahnsen vs Stein - The Great Debate (part 5 of 14)

Greg Bahnsen vs Gordon Stein - The Great Debate: Does God Exist? (part 5 of 14)

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• rational
• response
• squad
• blasphemy
• challenge
• apologetics
• TAG
• Transcendental
• Argument
• for
• the
• Existence
• of
• God

[workingclasstheist]

No, he didn't avoid it. You can't disprove a universal negative. He answered it well.

Bahnsen gave Stein a spanking.

[BenjaminWirtz]

Stein set himself up so bad for the logic being immaterial comeback.

[imnotmelton]

Man...Bahnsen is simply irrefutable in this whole exchange. Stein is running damage control the whole time, but Bahnsen's opening statement pretty much did away with whatever Stein could have brought to the table.

[matanga69]

religius people are the worst spokesmen for the existence of god , you dont need religion to prove god , you need religion to disprovve god , this is why religion is anti-god, this is like creating the right and the left party , its just a show , the religius guy is endoctrinated , and so is the atheist, none of them are being imparcial, if ther is such a thing. religion makes god look silly ans programed, this is why atheist find the idea absurd , religion is anti-god, just my opinion, thx4vid

[jfinite]

@BenjaminWirtz

Yeah, little bit, but he also equated god with constructs of the mind, which I thought recovered well.

[grantfaceclaw]

Really? I find Dr. Bahnsen quite confusing, I don't really understand the points he makes.

[LowestFormOfTwit]

7:03 - "Yeah."

[5440Borderline]

By the way... 2:13 is clever, very clever. Point for Dr. Bahnsen. :)

[5440Borderline]

This debate is a cross between a sword fight and a ballet. Both of these men are exceptionally intelligent, but I'd say Dr. Bahnsen expresses himself more clearly than Dr. Stein. He has the upper hand.

[dent3138]

....I think you must have missed the immaterial part concerning laws...