Democracy is Mob Absolutism

http://fringeelements.ning.com/page/for-an-emergent-governance

A certain amount of majoritarianism is a fact of reality. There is no need to further deify and make corporeal advantages the majority already has.

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• Democracy
• kill
• socreates
• elect
• hitler
• bush
• obama
• mass
• politics
• islam
• collectivism
• democrat
• republican
• conservative
• liberal

[fringeelements]

lol no, I thought I was pretty clear. I oppose democracy theoretically, the idea that anyone can take shit from me just by voting is insane and leads to chaos.

[fringeelements]

Right, that's the implied communism of democracy manifest. It makes doing business impossible because there's no stability of law, it makes all wealth up for grabs to whoever can get the most votes. Chaos. It makes a modern industrial firm and the intricate and fragile division of labor that occurs in a calibrated market economy impossible.

It's pre-economic barbarism, mobs of apemem smashing the machines. It's chauvinistic and tribalistic and utterly uncivilized. It's retrograde concentrate.

[CherryGanz]

Democracy is a form of tyranny ==>> "Majority Rules"

Universal suffrage is a form of socialism ==>> "The Right to Vote"

Equal suffrage is a form of communism ==>> "One Person, One Vote"

[addvoc8]

Right on! Our founders reviled democracy for just those reasons, and thus democracy is not mentioned in our constitution, but democracy IS one of the planks of the depraved Communist Manifesto.

Spreading democracy is spreading pure BS and total global control: Agenda 21, communitarianism, NWO...

[HotNationalist]

Damn good video

[fringeelements]

Most of the planet is empty, there is plenty of space for people to live. The problem is that states claim the entire habitable planet and impose artificial barriers to entry and exit. "Love it or leave it" is an unthinking, reactionary argument.

[fringeelements]

People don't consider themselves "statists" until it is brought up because statism is an implicit belief that was never logically or rationally justified. You didn't weigh the evidence and make a case for a state, you were a statist, and justify it after the fact.

[listen2meokidoki]

@Dirge987 But yes, you're right. I have forgotten the thread. But, my dear freind, egalitarianism is central to all political issues. Be they how society organises, to should there be absolutely no "state" and centralised government. Most people use common sense, They say I am proudly Statist. But I have an equal vote in a system which can change the government and constitution. And separation of power & authority. The USA presidency doesn't.

[listen2meokidoki]

@Dirge987 You imply, by the way you use the word "inherent", that there is absolutely no natural difference between two people that can be leverage so one can in any way control the other. But so what? Who cares? If a group (tribe) make rules of behaviour, yes anyone can stand up and leave. I suggest you leave. Try setting off into outer space. Yes, there are unherent risks. But inherent is you operative word. Take it and leave. You pose an inherent risk to society. so I will be watching you!

[Dirge987]

@listen2meokidoki Protip, if you're going to put together a coherent argument, or if you want to persuade, stay on topic. Egalitarianism, country of origin, history, don't have anything to do with the statement your originally made, or my response. Instead of tackling that issue, you performed the usual statist defense-mechanism - you shot off on a tangent and dodged the issue. Hint: don't, it makes you look stupid.

[Dirge987]

@listen2meokidoki Wow, what does being an American or an Australian have to do with the basic fallacy of the state? Hmmm, none. And what makes you think I'm an American?

The word of the day is sophistry.

[listen2meokidoki]

@listen2meokidoki I'll look at yoour videos later. They LOOK interesting. But probably stupid.