Taking on common Creationist canards relating to what evolution is and isn't, and what it does or doesn't depend on or relate to.
Here's the script
http://darwinwasright.homes...
Taking on common Creationist canards relating to what evolution is and isn't, and what it does or doesn't depend on or relate to.
Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
So far I do have very limited experience in biology (college-equivalent) but wouldn't it be accurate to say that evolution actually does apply to non-genetic processes as well, provided those relate to RNA and DNA?
For instance, in something referred to as chemical evolution, structures such as lipid membranes are advantageous and thus passed on without any DNA or RNA required as an information medium.
@AronRa: Is it considered accurate to explain changes in viruses over time with evolutionary processes, since they are not considered alive? Thank you.
That's actually a great question. I don't wanna step on toes, but I just gotta take a stab @ it Short answer is "yes". Longer answer: because viruses carry genetic information & that genetic info is subject to change through various mechanisms, the term "evolution" does apply.
Where things get really murky is when you ask, "Are viruses alive"? Some *do* "count them among the living". Some do not. Better than anything else, they highlight the difficulty of answering the question, "What is life"?
Viruses do not change by themselves and they can't reproduce themselves like bacteria or cells.They must attach themselves to the cell membrane of animals, or cell wall of plants and inject a part of their DNA into the cells of the host organism.
But the question of life the universe and everything has already been answered! It's 42. Just read the wonderful book 'Hitchhikers guide to the Galaxy'. 1200+ comments, someone else must have posted the same comment as me...
Sorry, couldn't resist. Love the videos, shame that you have to make them.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
For instance, in something referred to as chemical evolution, structures such as lipid membranes are advantageous and thus passed on without any DNA or RNA required as an information medium.
If I'm wrong, I truly wish to be corrected.
In truth there is evolution in almost anything.
However, when we talk about evolution. Then we talk about the theory of evolution. Which is only the diversity of life.
Gotta go read bible instead, much easier!
Short answer is "yes".
Longer answer: because viruses carry genetic information & that genetic info is subject to change through various mechanisms, the term "evolution" does apply.
Where things get really murky is when you ask, "Are viruses alive"?
Some *do* "count them among the living".
Some do not.
Better than anything else, they highlight the difficulty of answering the question, "What is life"?
Sorry, couldn't resist. Love the videos, shame that you have to make them.
That's probably not how it happened.