CIA Panetta seen in Pakistan Nuclear 'Pupet Regime?' on Taliban

23rd March -09. Leon Panetta, CIA chief, photographed visiting Pakistan to discuss cooperation between the two countries in dealing with Taliban.
Such dealings in which America seemingly freely engages. (see 1st link)
So when perceived USA compliant Pakistan's Prime Minister, Yousuf Gilan puts the troops onto his own people in compliance with America's wishes, then what if; as put by Anthropos 1st June 2009 at haloscan.com
..
the foot soldier, the sergeants, the captains, the nuclear scientists, the technologically sophisticated students will desert the Zionised Zardari and his minions, take control of the nukes and decide to join Iran and other Muslim peoples in the ME in a united front against the Zionised West.
..
just as troops turned on The USAs Puppet Shah of Iran when he set his generals to attack their own countrymen during an uprising.

And what then?,
Does USA go on with a pre-emptive attack on Iran and a nuclear Pakistan just as it did on Afghanistan and Iraq?? .

Re: USA fomenting of Pakistans Pashtun region conflict bordering with Afghanistan in 1979. (see Brzezinski giving them a pep talk in 1979 in 3rd link)

Carter-era national security advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski back in 1998 (pre 9/11) admitted to France's Le Nouvel Observateur that he and CIA director Bill Casey cooked up the idea of trying to provoke a Soviet invasion of Afghanistan by providing covert aid via the Pakistani intelligence services to the mujahideen. "What is most important to the history of the world?," Brzezinski reportedly told the paper, in its January 15-21, 1998 issue. "The Taliban or the collapse of the Soviet empire? Some stirred-up Muslims or the liberation of Central Europe and the end of the cold war?"..

In 1953 USA & UK funded operation AJAX to depose Irans then democratically elected secular government of Prime Minister Mohamed Mosadeq, and succeeded in returning the Shah of Iran on his throne and supported his brutal police state for decades as a buffer against Moscow; the revolution that deposed him created a nation governed by ayatollahs.

Then USA supported Dictator Saddam Hussein as a counter to Soviet diplomacy and as a buffer against fundamentalist Iran.
USA allied itself with hereditary despots from Morocco to the Arab Peninsula—and the result was a wave of Islamic fundamentalism, which these regimes financed to bribe their peoples into quiescence, and whose ummist extremists fertilized the resentments that allowed the bin Ladens of this world to recruit so successfully. From Anwar Sadat and Hosni Mubarak in Egypt to Zia al-Haq in Pakistan to Ferdinand Marcos in the Philippines to Suharto in Indonesia.
The USA was engaged in many social experiments in its efforts to promote its interests and now it understandably seems as though its chickens are coming home to roost.
Is this the mission accomplished which George Bush boasted of?
Where USA can now claim justification as one by one it invades any country which stands between it and oil flow total control?

It sure is an important oil pipe line running through Afghanistan that USA want to control.
And their attitude was expressed in the words of USAs Secretary of State Madeline Albright in Dec 1996 when asked about U.S. sanctions against Iraq which resulted in the deaths of half a Million Children
I think this is a very hard choice, but the price--we think the price is worth it.
It seems now that America has well succeeded in its expressed INTENDED creation of Some stirred-up Muslims; and locked itself and much of the world into a path which likely leads into bigger and more wide spread conflict and death.
How big, is anybodys guess.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SQu3nP7L_ng&NR=1
http://www.haloscan.com/comments/tf2777/article22740_htm/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kYvO3qAlyTg

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Zbigniew
• Brzezinski
• PNAC
• Council
• on
• Foreign
• Relations
• CFR
• War
• On
• Terror
• Pakistan
• Afghanistan
• Iran
• Iraq
• Oil
• Crusade
• Trilateral
• Commission
• Mujahadeen
• Pashtun
• Taliban

[zamakanoon]

why do indian and USA concern so much of pakistan nuke while usa itself lost 6 life ready to exploud nuke in recent years

yes we have crupt leadership being impose on us by USA but that does not mean they the leadership know about pakistan nuke cos its in the millitary hand not in the leadership .. don`t poke ur dirty nose in pakistan internal affair or u will lost urslef in it. its deeper then 7 seas combine no one know whos in control where they put their nuke or where will they used them

[xv3owais]

AMERICAN BITCHS

[superiorgreen]

Have we been here before? Cambodia. CIA. Vietnam. More bombs dropped on a country the US was NOT at war with than all the bombs dropped on Japan during WWII. The country hobbled by war, The Khamer Rouge easily take power.

[sandjaq]

The two wars IRAQ and AFGHANISTAN will lead USA to bankrupcy, USA will be next Afghanistan.

[sandjaq]

Companies in Afghanistan with Taliban regime government, so you can do good business, The British said that the Afghan war can be for at least 40 years, is already 8 years since the start.

[sandjaq]

I think Pakistan fragile central government, will make it more difficult to control the inssergies activities in both Afghanistan and Pakistan so they will become in near future two battle fields, with the presence of nuclear weapons in Pakistan is very dangerous situation and may involve India as well.

[JagaJatt44]

Well Actually, we got all the Oil and Set Up our Companies in Afghanistan, so USA mission is actually now, it doesnt even matter if we withdraw.

[bravebloodpashtoon]

who,s winng the war still taliban man just get the fuck out there ...