High stakes poker season 2 episode 5 1
Top Comments
All Comments (39)
-
@xjsk88 pretty much
-
@VicenzoV Great analysis and totally true. Antonio has as he put it built up his "squeeze equity" essentially giving himself a tight image to the table, if someone 3-bets you in a normal hand you'd put them on one of 7 hands.. .AK,AQ,AA,KK,QQ,JJ and maybe AJ if they are a little loose. At this level they can 3-bet with almost anything but seeing as how Antonio has not played all that many hands and he and Laak play together a lot there is more than just his cards to consider and hence laydown
-
@aliabideen hes also a racist asshole
-
Hah "the 10-5 or the aces", Antonio says you decide 17k. Just a beautiful moment
-
am i the only one who thinks gabe is a retard?
-
Gabe > Norman Chad. Why? Gabe is also a good analyst while having a good sense of humor, Norman on the other hand has no idea about poker and is just part of the show to act like a clown. I guess it's funny for 10 year olds. Although I laugh at his jokes sometimes, i rember once he refered to Ivey's hand as "a 7% percent hand"...that was pretty good :D
-
@StevenLehr4 STFU shitbag.
-
@DenyoKr one reason only, he's protecting his wins
-
awesome!
Gab Keplan is funny and best poker commenteter.
aliabideen 2 years ago 36
@DenyoKr Everyone knows JJ is the best hand here, as we see what Antonio has. But when you get reraised preflop and the guy bets more than two-thirds the pot on the flop, you gotta trust your read and go all the way with it. The guy who folds on the flop loses 10k. The players who call or raise in this situation are the ones who lose their whole stack against AA, KK, QQ or a set at a regular basis.
Phil Laak is smart and makes money playing poker. I wouldn't worry about him very much.
VicenzoV 6 months ago 3