Jesus Didn't Tap! Stupid Shit Athletes Say

What's with all the athletes thanking Jesus for their victories? This type of mindless nonsense needs to be mocked until athletes become tired of being the butt of the joke and stop doing it.

If you like it, please share it.

If you want to support my work please pick up a T-shirt on my website located @ http://www.cultofdusty.com/?page_id=393

Category:

Comedy

Tags:

• girls
• women
• sex
• cute
• hot
• sexy
• date
• marijuana
• atheism
• games
• technology
• apple
• ipod
• mac
• iphone
• electronics
• futurism
• movies
• trailers
• fast
• food
• funny

[JoshLikesMusic]

Tacitus talks about Jesus and his followers. The Talmud makes mention of Him and His crucifixion. There are plenty of ambiguous sources, but the best sources are the gospels, and the fact that they are historically quite accurate. I did make an argument from authority, because I'm limited to only a few hundred characters. But I'm certain you have significant beliefs that you base nearly entirely on the words of experts or authorities in the field, simply because there's no way you couldn't.

[CultOfDusty]

@JoshLikesMusic Also, even the bible itself is not a contemporary sources as none of the passages about Jesus were written until decades after his supposed death. So number one, you don't know what the word "contemporary" means, and number two, all you have are fairy tales written decades after these things supposedly happened with absolutely no historical evidence to back up their ridiculous claims. Only an incredibly gullible person would take this as proof of Christ's existence.

[CultOfDusty]

@JoshLikesMusic Tacitus is written some time after 117 C.E. There is no mention of "Jesus," only "the sect known as Christians" living in Rome being persecuted, and "their founder, one Christus." Tacitus claims no first-hand knowledge of Christianity. No historical evidence exists that Nero persecuted Christians and, most damning, the term "Christian" was not even in use in the first century.

[CultOfDusty]

@JoshLikesMusic No one in the second century ever quoted this passage of Tacitus. In fact, it appears almost word-for-word in the fourth-century writings of Sulpicius Severus, where it is mixed with other obvious myths. Citing Tacitus, therefore, is highly suspect and adds virtually nothing to the evidence for a historical Jesus.

Such are the straws believers must grasp in order to prop up their myth.

[CultOfDusty]

@JoshLikesMusic Dr. Teresa Lodi, the director of the Laurentian Library, examined the features of this item of the manuscript; she concluded that there are still signs of an 'e' being erased, and distortion of the remainder into an 'i'. It was discovered that under ultraviolet light, an 'e' is clearly visible in the space, meaning that the passage must originally have referred to chrestianos, a Latinized Greek word which could be interpreted as the good. This has the meaning 'good, useful'.

[CultOfDusty]

@JoshLikesMusic Historians have no evidence of a historic Jesus dating from the early first century, even though many contemporary writers documented the era in great detail. Philo of Alexandria, for example, wrote in depth about early first-century Palestine, naming other self-proclaimed messiahs, yet never once mentioning a man named Jesus. Many other contemporary writers covered that era, yet there is not a single mention of any existence, deeds, or words of a man named Jesus.

[CultOfDusty]

@imThatFknGuy You're the only one who can't properly spell the two letter word "am".

[andrewh817]

@virgilmcdonald You say you couldn't imagine living life without Christ. Yes you can, you're doing it right now!

[castrophist]

Jesus would have not tapped you idiot...

[subwayjrod1]

you have never read the bible has you ? gonna pray for you

[MaverickHunterX3]

@CultOfDusty You're well-aware that Jesus is not a Greek word, right? Of course you'll not be able to see that name in a Greek transcript. Of course you are not aware of any contemporary writer who has mentioned Jesus because you never read them. By the way, if you're stressing to use logic, then why respond with "he couldn't tap out because his hands are nailed"? You are aware that tapping out only works in the presence of the referee, right?

[MaverickHunterX3]

@JordanECMusic The very first entity who gave him the option to tap out is Satan himself, who tempted him three times in the desert. When he was praying in Gethesemani, he was also pondering that time if he should call it quits or not. In the very end, he continued his mission and vision no matter how much persecution he will receive for his efforts. That's the kind of determination and willpower Mixed Martial Artists desire.

[ralf4586]

you would tap out like a bitch, guess Jesus is more man than you ever will be. and i don't see u doing shit to help children so why bash Jesus about it, it's called being hypocritical bro.

[JordanECMusic]

The Romans gave him the option of tapping out. Poncious pilate told Jesus if he denied who he was then he would let him go. Jesus wanted to die for our sins. So yeah Jesus didn't tap would be correct.

[stevebuscemi6]

He could not tap, he got KO

[MaverickHunterX3]

I get it now, they are thanking Jesus because He served as an inspiration for the athletes not to quit in order to achieve victory. Not because they are thanking Jesus for hurting his opponent.

[MaverickHunterX3]

And "Jesus didn't tap" is an MMA term for "Jesus didn't quit"