HHO Dry Cell Installed In 89 Ford Mustang #6

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
17,561
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jun 13, 2009

I have been working on a Dry Cell or SSC (Sealed Series Cell) design for a YEAR now for my mustang. I finally came up with a design that meet and exceeds my design criteria. 1) It has to be capable of 2 Litter per minute or better of production. 2) Draw less than 25 amps while producing 2 Litter per minute. By using two individual cell sandwiched together with the magnetic fields aligned, a spacing of 3/32, and a High electrolyte concentration I was able to meet my goals.

The cell has 14 plates total. They are 6 x 6 inches. The cell draws 35 amps straight DC but is current limited with a constant current PWM set at 21 Amps. The cell reaches a maximum of 110 Deg on a hot day. I am using a digital EFIE set at 0.22 volts added. I do not have any modifications to the MAP sensor. The MAP sensor is frequency based and I can not find a MAP enhancer for my specific application. The Fuel Pre-Heater is still installed and working fine.

I am currently getting 43 MPG Highway. My stock MPG is 28-29 before HHO . The Modification have raised my Fuel Efficiency by 53%. The car drives and runs just like it were stock with the exception that I am not saving money and not producing any pollution as shown at the end of the video.

I know this Technology to be Fact and I Demonstrate that HHO WORK every time I dive my car.

Skeptics, don't bother posting a comment because you comments will just be removed and you will be blocked.

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (PeteDog444)

  • Nice set up! I'm in the process of building my own cell as well.

    Your math is a bit off for your % increase in mileage though. (43-29)/43= .325 or in other words 32.5% increase in mileage. That's still pretty good. It's what i hope to get when i have everything completed on my car. =)

  • This is how I calculate % of increase.

    28-43 MPG= 15......15/28 = 0.5357 x 100 = 53.57%

    According to all the Java Calculator I have found, they all come up with the same numbers.

  • I aint your momma so I aint gonna say nuthin about my concerns about having that thing in the back seat ... am sure you are very much aware of the related issues ...

    your mileage gains are impressive ... any chance we can twist your arm and get you to have a few dyno runs done with/without the system engaged ???  would be nice to be able to add your results with others we are accumulating ...

  • I under stand all of the concerns about the consequences of a back flash but when was the last time you modern fuel injected vehicle back fired. I have experienced my share of back flashes playing with my HHO torch and I do have a healthy respect for it's power. As for the Dyno runs, I would be happy to put my vehicle on a dyno for some numbers if some one else come up with the money for it. I am unemployed and living with Crohns so there is little to no money in my future.

Top Comments

  • And you are still using the fuel heater, correct? Did the emissions station test for NOx as well? Your fuel economy increase is phenomenal. Please continue to keep us posted.

see all

All Comments (36)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Hey but what do you need to make it work? Just water?

  • Can this be run just on the hydrogen and no petrol?? If so how much would be needed, especially if your already at 2ltr

  • Great job. Keep up the inspirational work!! Installing my first fuel-heater next week. '93 Ford Escort GT (1.8 Mazda Engine) 45 MPG so far, WITHOUT HHO or fuel heater. trying for 60-70 MPG. Stay tuned lol.

  • Clean setup. Do they come in a Dodge b350 360 version?

  • Like your set up look good

  • I love the ''zero fossil fuel'' constant current design. i just made one for my '88 festiva. mileage tests are next, im hoping way past 50 mpg's. buts its all about how you tune in the system. your's is simple and looks great!

  • hello..in the third block of your explanation...you mean .."i am now saving money.." am i right .? ..also ..how many miles you reach per liter of water....what kind of water are u using..and finally to get 21 amps without a problem : did u change your alternator. Thanks and keep getting results ! the only point that looks not so practical is to have the system in the back seat..?..any way...congrats for the numbers

  • @shapedcolors if you have two apples and add one, you get an increase of 50%. You want to know the increase in percentage of the previous MPG, not of the final MPG. His previous MPG was 32,5% lower than the final MPG, but his previous MPG was 32,5% lower than the final MPG.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more