Core i7 920 cinebench Benchmark

This takes 48 seconds flat but oddly enough when recording it takes 1 min to finish,still very impressive oppose to my old quad core q9550 or q9450.

Please watch my build video for the specs which this test is being done on,btw this is also being done on 3.0 ghz on the i7,i tested it out on 3.5 and 4.0 and all finished at the same time 48 SECONDS

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Core i7 920 d0 stepping
• cinebench
• windows 64 bit
• windows 7

[niceboy60]

my Qx9650 quad core extrem @3870mhz takes also 53

[IRud3Bwoy]

@niceboy60

sure but against a i7 or my 980x it can't render as good and that is a fact LOL will take ages to render on a regular quad =x

[niceboy60]

@IRud3Bwoy

If You expect 8 cores cpu to be 100 % faster or double the speed when comparing to 4 core cpu, you are completely wrong

To guive you a example a normal i7 without being overclocked can do this test in 52s wich is good , my cpu without any overclock can do this 1:10s , which means, the small difference is not even a 20% difference in performance dispite having double the cores

[IRud3Bwoy]

@niceboy60

lol are you crazy do we really need to put your regular processor that is over clocked to my 980x in real world multi threaded apps to show the difference?

[SapphireHD5850Xtreme]

My AMD Athlon X4 640 @ 3,0GHz need 49 Seconds (17688 CB-CPU)

[karlos218]

hey nice vid, how does the I7 score against your old Q9550? i am thinking of going I7 as i do alot of rendering. cheers

[beachzone2]

i got 55 seconds on a corei7 860 stock

[chevguy502]

you def have something wrong as i said i do it in 35 secs

[chevguy502]

yup fucked i do it in 35 seconds he has something wrong

[IRud3Bwoy]

eh everything i use my pc for i have seen no gains at a 4.0 ghz oc LOL.just a waste oc and to have your e peen bigger.