Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Munk Debates: Is Africa held back by circumstances? (8 of 15)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
4,181
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jun 4, 2009

The 2009 Munk Debates: "Be it resolved, foreign aid does more harm than good" (June 1, 2009).

Dambisa Moyo and Hernando De Soto argue in favour of the motion. Paul Collier and Stephen Lewis argue against the motion.

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (12)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @CrowdPleeza And when Carlyle declared economics to be the "dismal science" it was because economists opposed slavery while Carlyle thought that blacks should be forced to work against their will, which he thought was to everyone's betterment.

  • @cmbradford More specifically, by legislation (to call on Hayek's law/legislation dichotomy).

  • So there has not been much chance for the 2 presidents to make much of a difference.

    The chief problem is that those british companies outright own the tea/coffee sectors, and you cannot simply re-write legislation because they are protected by contract rights.

    The lazy option is to do what Mugabe did in Zimbabwe did to the white farmers and try to take everything over by force.

    Not a good option

    But nevertheless a very difficult thing to do.

  • The vast majority of Kenya's presidentship was run by Daniel Moi. A kind of pseudo-dictator who stayed in power with dirty politics for almost a quarter century

    Then Kibaki came into power, and remained for one term before a new election. Memories of Moi's corruption is what exploded the country in violence a few years ago when people thought he rigged the election. The country is currently a dual-presidentship with Kibaki and Raila

  • As far as the British benefiting more from Kenya's tea/coffee how have Kenyan leaders addressed this?

    Has Kenya's leaders made business activity easier? I checked Kenya's economic freedom ratings from the Heritage Foundation and they pointed out that corruption and lax property rights were hurting the country. Are Kenyan leaders addressing these things?

  • The connection is not a universal one, and varies from country to country, depending on the ineptitude of its 1st african leader(s)

    Take the country I was born in for example. Kenya's most valuable foreign export is Tea/ Coffee . When Kenya gained independence, the 1st president made backroom deals with the british before they left

    To this day, the lions share of Kenya's most valuable resource (tea/coffee) is owned by British companies and ends up in London banks. That is a big problem

  • Slavery is enforced through law, not market structures.

  • Could you elaborate on your capitalism-slavery connection? Europeans at that time were practicing mercantilism and not capitalism. Adam Smith,considered the father of capitalism,was opposed to slavery.

  • If capitalism is so bad for Africa then why does Botswana have one of Africa's best economies? Free markets and trade(with moderate regulations) can work in African countries but African countries need more basic infrastructure like more roads and railroads so that the benefits of trade can touch more people.

  • capitalism will be the worst thing for africa... u think blk american slavery was horrible... try capitalism in africa...

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more