"Transitional Color" Between Blue and Green?

********
This video (and most everything else I do) is released under this Creative Commons license:
http://tinyurl.com/rabidapelicense

under the following conditions:

1) You must include a link back to the original source (ie the url to this page) and/or http://youtube.com/rabidape and/or http://rabidape.net

2) The use is licensed for non-commercial purposes only.

Contact me if you have any questions.

********

think about it....

http://twitter.com/rabidape
facebook: http://tinyurl.com/d78g4a

Category:

Education

Tags:

• transitional
• forms
• fossils

[SadChristian]

Meh, fossils still aren't an experiment. They're just evidence to infer what happened in the past - a retrospective study. In other words, unless you have an experiment, it's still just an explanation to fit what you see. (Religion anyone?)

Peace!

[RabidApe]

"They're just evidence to infer what happened in the past - a retrospective study"

Not quite. You can use data gathered from, previous findings in order to make predictions about fossils in the future.

example:

"if I dig in ("virgin") location X, I will find fossils Y, and I won't find fossil Z"

You can falsify evolution by finding fossil rabbits in Precambrian rock.

[Mazaloth]

Photo-shopped. I don't believe it. V

Stop trying to trick these poor innocent folks.

You horrible, horrible, horrible, Trickster.

You sir, are worse than a politician.

Everyone knows that blue and yellow makes purple!

[donfishmaster]

@silentpimpsmak and that only leaves....

THE MAGICAL SKY DADDY DID IT!!!

[greenjelly01]

Brilliant! I was thinking of the same analogy, good to see someone actually make a video about it.

[seeker6789]

There are NO transitional colors... God made colors exactly the way they are... Colors were not made to intermingle. That is unholy. LOL

[nycgroove1]

@SadChristian How do you get from questioning fossils (without real reason to), to religion? What does one have to do with the other?

[systematic101]

@silentpimpsmak Do explain how. Making the claim and declaring victory is not enough. How is abiogenesis proven wrong and how does abiogenesis being proven wrong stop evolution?

[ArchRascal]

Great analogy and visual. This is a really clever way of explaining transitional forms.

[onijester56]

@Venividibatna

"God is great ,God is powerful ,he'll kill you with fire infidel ."

"Jesus is great ,Jesus is powerful ,he'll kill you with fire infidel ."

"Yahweh is great ,Yahweh is powerful ,he'll kill you with fire infidel ."

"Odin is great ,Odin is powerful ,he'll kill you with fire infidel ."

"Chronos is great ,Chronos is powerful ,he'll kill you with fire infidel ."

"Ra is great ,Ra is powerful ,he'll kill you with fire infidel ."

Come one. Get something new.

[onijester56]

@silentpimpsmak Evolution does not rely on abiogenesis. Even if it were proven that some type of god DID make the first cell, that would have no impact on Evolution as both a fact and a theory.

It's the variations that you don't realize are there that actually have the most impact. They aren't removed by natural selection as they aren't detrimental to fitness, yet are cumulative.

And each scientific hypothesis of abiogenesis is based on observed scientific facts.

[silentpimpsmak]

i wish people would stop trying to refer to variations in species as actual evolution. For one you would never know those variations were already in that species gene pool. Another i want to know when a species changes into a different kind of species. Just go right back to the fact abiogenesis is basically proven false and impossible and it stops evolution dead in its tracks.

[Venividibatna]

allah is great ,allah is powerful ,he'll kill you with fire infidel .