Richard Dolan -The Need-to-Know Petition

On November 30, 2011, Richard M. Dolan and Bryce Zabel, co-authors of A.D. After Disclosure, drafted a petition to the White House to "Investigate Unidentified Aerial Phenomena as Reported by Citizens, Police, Astronauts, Pilots and the Military." The full text of the petition reads:

"Searching for microbes on Mars and radio signals from space is not enough. We must explain Unidentified Aerial Phenomena, or UAP, right here on Earth.

For six decades worldwide, credible witnesses (including Presidents Carter and Reagan) have consistently described objects with flight capabilities beyond our technology. UAP are often verified by radar and even seen at nuclear sites by military officers.

Given the national security implications, the United States should conduct an independent investigation. This inquiry must transparently review the key unsolved UAP reports with access to classified documents. It must have the power to call witnesses and grant immunity.

The findings should be publicly presented."

The petition is valid for 30 days, and expires Dec. 30, 2011. It requires 25,000 signatures to elicit a response from the White House. Please sign. Go to http://afterdisclosure.com

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• UFO
• UAP
• Dolan
• Zabel
• Disclosure
• White House Petition
• ET
• alien
• cover-up

[dahurWhisperer]

@dahur The only possible conclusion that can be drawn from your notorious behaviour to attempt character assassination by quoting compromizing out-of-context quotes is, you ran out of arguments. Although I can understand your exo-religious feelings, it might be a surprising fact for you, but astrobiology is a scientific topic; bound to the accepted rules of a scientific proof.

[SophistAssassin]

@CaneFu

The problem was your premise. It seemed to be, "if there is no proof that UFOs are alien in origin, then they are not worth investigating." Of course, proof would defeat the whole purpose of investigation in the first place! Proof of origin is irrelevant to the purpose of the petition in question. You have ignored that point, and all others, throughout the entire discussion. It took decades to obtain proof of "rocks falling from the skies." UFOs are less generous with samples.

[dwinkinney37e]

This is a "grandiose" video. =p

[DanFrederiksen]

I've heard of your book AD Richard and it's an interesting topic and related to another interesting topic, estimating the ufo situation, piecing it all together. You're probably my favorite 'ufologist' but there is one aspect of UFOs that I have curiously overlooked until recently and I think you may not have focused much on either and that is the abductions. which if true tells us so much because it's up close and detailed.

so one question comes to mind, what do you make of the telepathy?

[sketch2k]

I still see no reason for secrecy. At all. Whatsoever. It's not even a 'shocker'. Big news is big news.

The only things that should remain secret are our sex lives and bathroom breaks.

If 'they' can disable our most advanced war planes but don't come around turning off super computers etc. I think it's safe to say they're pretty cool entities and are looking out for us dumb monkeys.

Let's show them some respect and stop fighting needless wars and start repairing earth.

Happy new year, psychos.

[jklinne8]

"Sightings of unexplained objects at great altitude and traveling at high speeds in the vicinity of major US defense installations are of such nature that they are not attributable to natural phenomena or known types of aerial vehicles."

~ Dr. H Marshall Chadwell, former assistant director of the CIA's Office of Scientific Intelligence, in a December, 1952 memo to then-director of the CIA, General Walter B. Smith.

[dahur]

"I tell lies in accordance with the official policy I obey due to my insights".

~ SHOLVA AKA debrainwasher, dahurHunter, dahurWhisperer, lllwindrunner, and many other user names

Posted under:

"UFO Multiple activity over Melbourne Australia June 2nd 2011 "

[llIwindrunner]

(ff2)..the extraordinary nature of a UAP. All studies, that followed accepted scientific methodology, identified hundreds of natural- and man-made phenomena. [UK MoD UAP Report, 2001]. Many of them were classified military flying machines, indeed. Without a tangible proof, no serious scientist will ever dive into the topic. It's not a coincidence, exo-ufoistical pseudo-scientists, never use real scientific instruments to back up their claims. They rely on anecdotical stories and interpretations.

[llIwindrunner]

@jklinne8 You've just followed the logical fallacy of the medieval dark ages: Not the process of investigation turns a particular UAP-sighting into a identified phenomenon, but the existence of sufficient and unambigous data. 65 years of (more or less) serious ufoistical research revealed, not one single UAP with sufficient data was extraordinary. Without such data, a UAP remains unidentified; forever. Since no new objective investigation can create new facts, there is no reason to even assume..

[jklinne8]

@llIwindrunner Nope. Good scientist can be good skeptics but are not career debunkers and in reality, any UFO is a “UFO” until it is properly investigated and identified. Debunkers tend toward claims about having solved what a major case UFO is and yet with no proof to show for their claims while most of the world population has mainly formed a speculative opinion or hypothesis about UFOs and not made claims. Remember- Debunkers such as yourself have even confessed to being pursued by the FBI.