9/11 There Is A Hole There Near The Top Of The South Tower (Jay Zimmerman)
Loading...
4,206
Loading...
Uploader Comments (IranContraScumDid911)
see all
All Comments (14)
-
Notice what a clear day it is. Amatuer film-man V MSM!.
-
which should not have to be quite clear chimney effect!
-
Checkout all of the thick black smoke at street level 1:29. Doesn't smoke rise?
-
@MrKoenig1985 Hallo, Schnucki, nu is aber gut. Essen ist fertig. Lass die doofe 11. September Kagge. Gab eh keine Flugzeuge wurde doch alles reingeschnitten. Und nu hobbhobb: Ab nach Hause du Schlingel!
-
I see. Do you remember the photographs from NIST? That are the same smoke trails at the south face.
Loading...
Everything is a conspearacy with you people!
borg386 10 months ago
@borg386 No we use scientific benchmarks and verifiable evidence. Everything is a hypothetical conspiracy story to you. Isaac Newton and Galileo are hardly conspiracy. What do they say about two 1/4 mile high buildings exploding in to dust into themselves in 10 seconds? It is not even possible without explosives. You ahve a 30 IQ and love global socialism and wars while not being safe at home. Get lost, you are the theorist and are easily disproven. What are your tests for fact? CNN and Obama?
IranContraScumDid911 10 months ago
Sorry, but I didn't see a hole at the south face, except the impact hole between the 77th and 85th floor.
MrKoenig1985 1 year ago
@MrKoenig1985 The cameraman did. I think he is talking about the isolated smoke spot in the center of the building 25 floors above the impact area and well outside the explosion damage zone. There would be no reason for the building to be damaged there and not on lower floors between. Even if the blast were to travel up a shaft, it would be dispersed, not directed at a specific area right below the main hat truss connection. The same spot WTC1 explodes at during first strike (Naudet Video).
IranContraScumDid911 1 year ago
@IranContraScumDid911 You don't suppose that "hole" was caused by people smashing out windows for air?
Chris2745100 4 months ago
@Chris2745100 Could be. Saying so would be all theory, or explaination without evidence. It is what it is, no need to explain or make up a story. Move on to the next piece of evidence ... the picture will form.
IranContraScumDid911 4 months ago