http://wonkroom.thinkprogre... In an Earth Day hearing, Secretary of Energy Steven Chu was forced to explain to Rep. Joe Barton (R-TX) how oil is found in the Arctic. Chu and other administration o...
http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/200... In an Earth Day hearing, Secretary of Energy Steven Chu was forced to explain to Rep. Joe Barton (R-TX) how oil is found in the Arctic. Chu and other administration officials are testifying today before the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, where Barton is the top Republican.
BARTON: Dr. Chu, I don't want to leave you out. You're our scientist. I have one simple question for you in the last six seconds. How did all the oil and gas get to Alaska and into the Arctic Ocean?
CHU: (Laughter.) This is a complicated story but oil and gas is the result of hundreds of millions of years of geology and in that time also the plates have moved around. And so, it's a combination of where the sources of the oil and gas ...
BARTON: Isn't it obvious that at one time it was a lot warmer in Alaska and on the North Pole? It wasn't a big pipeline that we've created from Texas and shipped it up there and put it under ground so we can now pump it up and ship it back?
CHU: No, there are continental plates that have been drifting around throughout the geological ages.
BARTON: So it just drifted up there.
CHU: Uh.... That's certainly what happened. It's a result of things like that.
WAXMAN: The gentleman's time has expired.
The driving force for Alaskas oil formation during the Triassic era 200 million years ago, according to University of Alaska geologist Mark Rivera, is plate tectonics, which is the unifying theory of geology.
Ironically for someone who has called climate science absolute nonsense, Barton was actually onto something. During the Triassic, the entire planet was indeed a hothouse and entirely deglaciated. The carbon dioxide (CO2) content in the atmosphere was at its highest ever levels, spiking from 1000 parts per million to 3000 ppm. The end of the Triassic period was marked by one of the largest mass-extinction events in Earths history.
Habitable conditions for humanity, hundreds of millions of years later, are very different. Carbon dioxide levels, which had been below 300 ppm for the last 650,000 years and was stable at 280 ppm during the rise of human civilization, have skyrocketed since 1800 because of our burning of coal, oil, and natural gas to 388 ppm, a nearly 40 percent rise.
Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
This video has been removed from your Favorites. (Undo)
Like to Favorite videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
I didn't notice any comments on here about the direct causation of increased warmth retention and increased solar flare activity. Gore's graph shows warmth PRECEDING carbon output while it is actually solar flares that precede warming.
This was just one question by Barton to Chu. Barton's YT channel has the same clip. But, gtuess what. Barton doesn't allow comments on the video or his channel. I wonder why that is?
It's funny that Chu and a lot of other scientists have lecture vids on YT that are nearly an hour long. I doubt your attention span would suffice.
Barton represents part of Dallas and in East Texas the major oil reserves were created in the Cretaceous Period (98 myo) when the North American plate was pretty much in the same position it is now.
His comment "it just drifted up there..." I think really only shows ignorance about Alaska specifically and not of general geology or petrology which he may actually understand because it's important here in Texas.
Anyone really think Pelosi or Reid would know anymore?
The Nobel prize is meaningless. It only means he's an establishment figure and he's part of the team that is destroying the country. I mean, Obama is getting a Nobel Prize for being black. LOL
Peak oil is a fraud, there's plenty of oil in the ground and it will never run out, at least not for a long time. And by that time, we'll have a new technology.
The Jews are behind it all. Get rid of them and you won't be so uptight. Unless you are a Jew, of course.
Oh yeah, particle physics discovery has nothing to do with Chu an the Nobel. Right!
I love the way Dr Chu almost fell out of his chair. Barton's queston was so sophomoric. He was a buffoon for asking it with no real time remaining. Chu did give him the short and correct answer.
Eh no, he was suggesting that alaska at one point was warmer, and thus that human induced climate change is a lie.
The truth is that the land known as alaska was at one point warmer, but it wasn't where it is now due to plate tectonics, thus making the point moot. Chu wasn't dodging any points at all, he was trying to guide Barton through a very simple process that I learnt of when I was about 12.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
It's funny that Chu and a lot of other scientists have lecture vids on YT that are nearly an hour long. I doubt your attention span would suffice.
His comment "it just drifted up there..." I think really only shows ignorance about Alaska specifically and not of general geology or petrology which he may actually understand because it's important here in Texas.
Anyone really think Pelosi or Reid would know anymore?
It's stupid to bash him for not knowing that SPECIFIC fact. I bet 99.99% of the population doesn't know that either.
Barton assumed the oil/gas deposits were created when (the plate of) Alaska was in it's CURRENT position.
Barton was trying to make the point that Alaska must have been warmer in the past and then got cooler.
Peak oil is a fraud, there's plenty of oil in the ground and it will never run out, at least not for a long time. And by that time, we'll have a new technology.
The Jews are behind it all. Get rid of them and you won't be so uptight. Unless you are a Jew, of course.
Never trust a man with the name Chu
I love the way Dr Chu almost fell out of his chair. Barton's queston was so sophomoric. He was a buffoon for asking it with no real time remaining. Chu did give him the short and correct answer.
The truth is that the land known as alaska was at one point warmer, but it wasn't where it is now due to plate tectonics, thus making the point moot. Chu wasn't dodging any points at all, he was trying to guide Barton through a very simple process that I learnt of when I was about 12.