Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Booster Rally part 1

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
31,660
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 23, 2008

Discussion of Larry's Boyce replica on his vdub pickup

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (EletrikRide)

  • could you do a couple of simple test for me and report back.

    1. run your auto up to 60mph, hold the accel steady (do not us cruise control) and turn on hho. Did your auto speed up to ? (do not press on accel).

    2. run your auto up to 60mph with the hho on. remain at 60mph and turn the hho off. You should see mph go down. Let me know stats.

    Thanks,

  • 1. No.

    2. No you won't.

    Your suggestion is not a good test method. The volume of gas generated is not enough to change speed at these loads. It's all about burn quality, not power.

  • EletrikRide,

    Why is my suggestion incorrect. If auto gains in mpg that means you have let off the gas just a tad to gain any increase in mpg. If you did not let off of throttle your car will increase in speed due to new energy being introduced. Correct me on this if I'm wrong.

  • I did correct you, and I explained why.

  • Then tell me why if just the slightest amount (doesn't even register on gauges) of NOS there is a responding correlation in acceleration therefore one has to "let up" on the gas pedal resulting in an increase in mpg. Added combustible energy either by NOS or HHO is added combustible energy. Both would necessitate easing up on the throttle. At what LPM does one need to achieve to get any perceptible mpg increase using HHO?

  • I'm telling you and you are not hearing. NOS is not hydroxy. You have this mixed up. Pedal position has nothing to do with this. In larger quantities, it would make a noticeable difference. But at these quantities, its all about BURN QUALITY. Hydroxy assists in the more complete combustion of gasoline in the chamber for a reduction in the amount of fuel consumed. More efficient burn = better mileage. As I have already stated many times - an average of 20% with my design.

see all

All Comments (8)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Has anyone ever tested an HHO system equipped car officially by an accredited testing garage? There are government approved testing places, that are accepted by the EPA.

    It would be very helpful to pick the best HHO system that you guys know of, and have it tested.

    Perhaps there is a small difference in your favor.

  • so to calculate divide volts per cell you divide total voltage by total number of cells?

  • looksee captn nimrod, efi's can be leaned out, that means money is not sucked out your wallet. hho is about what goes on in the combustion chamber. gas burns, it does not explode in an ice. it burns, and after compression it burns a little faster and hho under compression probably burns faster . spark plugs fire say an inch before tdc and 3 inches after (piston wise)and hho is pumped in to make this happen faster than plain gas..efficiency increase is the name of the game

  • variacs are innefficient. diodes are innefficient. dc to ac back to dc invertors are very innefficient. 3 strikes and your out. its easier to tap the ac windings on generator ...but why? dc is easy to control if you dont add all that crap to it. im stumped why a man would go that route to make hho and not use the 12 volts it is perfect like it is.

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more