Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Do it yourself CLOSED SYSTEM PROPULSION APPARATUS (not iner

Simple to construct apparatus that demonstrate a closed system reactionless propulsion system as described in http://www.wjetech.50webs.c... have fun.  
 
Customize

More From: wjeconsultant

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
8 ratings
Sign in to rate
1,851 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (7)   Options

Loading...
voraistos (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
there would be no friction in space, so it woudn't work. Your design only works as when the fan retreats, its acceleration and force are not strong enough to make the railing move. replace the railings with empty space, and the whole thing becomes pointless. You can do this experiment by turning around on one leg using the power of the other. Now if you're standing in oil and butter instead of a shoe with good grip, you'll find it a lot more difficult to turn. I know I tried it as a kid :D
shubhsd (1 year ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Same case. A 'closed system' will not be able to produce a net positive force required for propulsion.

Aluminium rollers are almost frictionless when moving. Static friction is considerably high. Maybe you would even get a similar result on an air hockey table too.

But it would simply not work in space. When the Fan goes forward, the casing would go backwards. After the impact the reverse would happen. The system would remain stationary.
wjeconsultant (1 year ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
Note: In the video the module is placed on aluminum rails separated by aluminum rollers (tubes) this setup permits a near frictionless surface for recording the video, unfortunately the rail assembly in not very visible on the video. A new video is in the works.
shubhsd (1 year ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
The forward movement is caused because there is static friction between the table and the 'closed system'.

In space what would happen is that the chamber and the fan inside would keep oscillating. When the fan moves forward the chamber will move backward. And after the bump, vice versa.

Net effect the 'system' will remain in the exact same position in space.
andy372 (1 year ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
What if you add resistance to retropulsion?
juraj89 (1 year ago) Show Hide
+2
Marked as spam
It would be really nice if it was a closed system, but it isn't, while going forward, the propeller does give momentum to the box, but it is too small to overcome the friction with the table. When it bumps the box, it's momentum is used in a much smaller space of time,and it generates a greater force, large enough to overcome friction between the box and the table, what makes the box move. Nice try anyway.
CuerpoMuerto (1 year ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I'm so close to being a believer now... if only in-space testing was feasible. I think if you could show the same results in zero-G, you'd win a lot of people over. Keep up the good work.
QuantumCarl (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
You dumb, boy?

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.