7 Reasons to believe, opening statement in debate w/ shwanerd part 1

I provide 7 reasons to believe in God

Category:

Education

Tags:

• reasons
• to
• believe

[FranzDuckVideos]

5 parts? Good fuck. I think you need a life.

[migkillertwo]

I'm very sorry that you have a natural aversion to knowledge.

[Knowntje]

No, philosophy is using inductive and deductive reasoning

[bamboo4tameshigiri]

"according to migkiller the arguments he used"

All he has is a treadmill of philosophical apologist nonsense.

[Watchdawg]

@EndDepravity That's the exact thing I was wondering while watching this video.

[DevoutAtheist42]

It is better than most, but it's not original to the poster; if I'm not mistaken, William Lane Craig popularised this one, the Kalam Cosmological Argument.

[EndDepravity]

I love it! A theist who can hold his own .Your argument for a "god" is better than most I've heard but, you have not explained why the judeo-christian god is the cause. I agree that we live in a causal universe but; what exactly makes your god the cause? How come it can't be zeus or krishna?

[gusb232]

I never denied This>

I may simply be that the Fundmental nature of existance may be slightly un-uniform in nature.... That the slight asymetry could give rise to all possible state.... Our universe could just be one of the state that is more self consistant than not, an therfore could exist longer by borrowing from this Well of possiblity.

[gusb232]

Comparing time to Physical thing object like Rooms Is a rediculous analogy,

Time is not an object, and Neither do i think it is a series of moments.

Its been show that Causality begins to break down even before the energies assoicated with plank time.

[gusb232]

Well I deleted my comment Not because I think Im wrong but I see that this issue Is ultimately peripheral for both of us Since I do think there could be a god.

and the Kalam is only a secondary reason of support for your christianity.

But

I Do think this argument is un-sound.

Actually i think all the premises may be false.

(Im lazy to make a vid)

[migkillertwo]

virtual particles, once again, are not uncaused.

one more thing, please learn about the first principle of metaphysics and why it is ridiculous to say that non-being can give rise to being. After all, nothing has no properties. How can it possibly give rise to being?

[gusb232]

Kalam

[gusb232]

The First Premise is False!

See: (QCD)Quantum chromodynamics

or

watch?v=ECkG_JdodMA

[responder12345]

That's a good question, I guess it depends on your definition of 'god.'