Re: GOP Debate - Evolution Question
Loading...
Loading...
234
views
Loading...
0:49
GOP Debate - creationism vs. evolutionby magadrem371 views- 0:42
He Can Pop His Eyes Out of His Head...by Chronoecho35,634 views
- 0:34
Re: GOP Debate - Evolution Questionby Samostorm2,517 views
- 1:05
George Bush on Evolutionby giannid2162,353 views
- 4:48
Re: US Soldier Throws Puppy Off Cliff!by Chronoecho5,331 views
- 2:14
Mike Huckabee responds to evolution questionby HuckabeeForPresident2,861,428 views
- 0:26
GOP Debate - Evolution Questionby Gravitationalist144,050 views
- 6:27
The Evolution Delusion - Geocentricity Part Oneby redsky12,765 views
- 1:16
Republicans Hate Evolution, Science, Truthby adr1504,304 views
- 1:10
Speechless - Evolution vs. Creationismby EzraHorne107,505 views
- 1:03
Republican debate goes boomby LivableWorld10,944 views
- 8:14
The Evolution Delusion - Geocentricity Part Twoby redsky5,434 views
- 3:32
Mike Huckabee responds to evolution questionby angryreddinosaur7,711 views
- 27:54
The Origin of Species 01.a - Chapter 1 (part a)by RabidApe3,658 views
- 0:40
Evolution Questionby HuxleysBulldog918 views
- 0:30
A Question for Senator Brownback on Faith and Evolution.by RBurman6288862 views
- 7:28
I comment on an Evolution-Creation debate that I hadby Kabane522,932 views
- 5:55
Re: Mike Huckabee responds to evolution questionby thepathlesspath786 views
- 8:24
The View Season 10- Joy on the Debateby Edster7318,003 views
- 5:45
O'Donnell to Buchanan: GOP Embraces Ignoranceby heathr45631,305 views
@micah1116 No. However, I am saying that you cannot spell :) yay flame war!
metalextremeist99 1 year ago
idiot
modernrocks 1 year ago
haha, alright. This whole conversation is pretty much pointless. You obviously arent looking to change your idea. Its to shoot down my idea which is shared by the majority of the scientific community. This is a waste of breathe. Please dont argue that Im "running away" or something. This conversation is just not worth my time. And your micro macro philosphy is silly. Something dosent change from a Dog to a cat. Its extremely small changes over million of years.
Chronoecho 2 years ago
I can't believe how you don't get what your not seeing here. Once again define species and the debate will be over, you will realize that evolution is not observed. Your getting micro and macro confused and they have NOTHING to do with each other. Micro actually results in a loss of information. Macro would require a major gain in information, changes to morphology, etc. Micro can't possibly lead to macro, they are totally opposite things, yet you don't see this.
micah1116 2 years ago
No, a duplication of existing structures is not evolution, it's a copying of already existing information. Show me where an entirely new structure has been formed.
micah1116 2 years ago
Define what you mean by species. By kind I mean those that can interbreed and have the same morphology. Dogs and cats are different kinds. Define what you mean by species.
micah1116 2 years ago
I really cant get over what you said "the Debate is over new kinds of animals, not species" AN NEW ANIMAL = A NEW SPECIES. Its not that complicated. Take some more science classes. THEN come argue with me. Im going to post a video in my Video comments box, Watch it. THEN come talk to me.
Chronoecho 2 years ago
So When a Child has a genetic mutation in which they have 4 arms instead of two. Is that not the creation of a new structure? Is a mutation in which Something changes pigments not a new strudture? Or will you argue its just a changed structure. Mutation of a new structure is completely possible. Just Wiki mutation lol
Chronoecho 2 years ago
A Species IS a new kind of animal. And u got the theory thing wrong. You dont see evolution so you explain it. that makes it a theory. Just because You lose DNA dosent mean you are more advanced. Some worms have more DNA than humans.
Chronoecho 2 years ago
We don't see evolution so according to your definition it's not even a theory.
micah1116 2 years ago